Publikation: Randomized controlled trial of teaching methods : do classroom experiments improve economic education in high schools?
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
The authors present results from a comprehensive field experiment at Swiss high schools in which they compare the effectiveness of teaching methods in economics. They randomly assigned classes into an experimental and a conventional teaching group, or a control group that received no specific instruction. Both teaching treatments improve economic understanding considerably, while effect sizes between teaching treatments are almost identical. However, preexisting economic competencies crucially affect learning outcomes as more competent students seem to benefit disproportionately from classroom experiments, while weaker students lose out. Supplemental data indicate that the experimental treatment crowded out time for adequately discussing the subject, which may have limited less competent students to generate a profound understanding.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
EISENKOPF, Gerald, Pascal SULSER, 2016. Randomized controlled trial of teaching methods : do classroom experiments improve economic education in high schools?. In: The Journal of Economic Education. 2016, 47(3), pp. 211-225. ISSN 0022-0485. eISSN 2152-4068. Available under: doi: 10.1080/00220485.2016.1179143BibTex
@article{Eisenkopf2016-07-08Rando-35382, year={2016}, doi={10.1080/00220485.2016.1179143}, title={Randomized controlled trial of teaching methods : do classroom experiments improve economic education in high schools?}, number={3}, volume={47}, issn={0022-0485}, journal={The Journal of Economic Education}, pages={211--225}, author={Eisenkopf, Gerald and Sulser, Pascal} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/35382"> <dc:contributor>Sulser, Pascal</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Eisenkopf, Gerald</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Sulser, Pascal</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2016-07-08</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>Randomized controlled trial of teaching methods : do classroom experiments improve economic education in high schools?</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-09-22T12:35:58Z</dcterms:available> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/35382"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-09-22T12:35:58Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Eisenkopf, Gerald</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The authors present results from a comprehensive field experiment at Swiss high schools in which they compare the effectiveness of teaching methods in economics. They randomly assigned classes into an experimental and a conventional teaching group, or a control group that received no specific instruction. Both teaching treatments improve economic understanding considerably, while effect sizes between teaching treatments are almost identical. However, preexisting economic competencies crucially affect learning outcomes as more competent students seem to benefit disproportionately from classroom experiments, while weaker students lose out. Supplemental data indicate that the experimental treatment crowded out time for adequately discussing the subject, which may have limited less competent students to generate a profound understanding.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>