Publikation: Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Most molecular measures of inbreeding do not measure inbreeding at the scale that is most relevant for understanding inbreeding depression-namely the proportion of the genome that is identical-by-descent (IBD). The inbreeding coefficient FPed obtained from pedigrees is a valuable estimator of IBD, but pedigrees are not always available, and cannot capture inbreeding loops that reach back in time further than the pedigree. We here propose a molecular approach to quantify the realized proportion of the genome that is IBD (propIBD), and we apply this method to a wild and a captive population of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). In each of 948 wild and 1057 captive individuals we analyzed available single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data (260 SNPs) spread over four different genomic regions in each population. This allowed us to determine whether any of these four regions was completely homozygous within an individual, which indicates IBD with high confidence. In the highly nomadic wild population, we did not find a single case of IBD, implying that inbreeding must be extremely rare (propIBD=0-0.00094, 95% CI). In the captive population, a five-generation pedigree strongly underestimated the average amount of realized inbreeding (FPed=0.013<propIBD=0.064), as expected given that pedigree founders were already related. We suggest that this SNP-based technique is generally useful for quantifying inbreeding at the individual or population level, and we show analytically that it can capture inbreeding loops that reach back up to a few hundred generations.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
KNIEF, Ulrich, Georg HEMMRICH-STANISAK, Michael WITTIG, Andre FRANKE, Simon C. GRIFFITH, Bart KEMPENAERS, W FORSTMEIER, 2015. Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations. In: Heredity. 2015, 114(4), pp. 397-403. ISSN 0018-067X. eISSN 1365-2540. Available under: doi: 10.1038/hdy.2014.116BibTex
@article{Knief2015Quant-31076, year={2015}, doi={10.1038/hdy.2014.116}, title={Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations}, number={4}, volume={114}, issn={0018-067X}, journal={Heredity}, pages={397--403}, author={Knief, Ulrich and Hemmrich-Stanisak, Georg and Wittig, Michael and Franke, Andre and Griffith, Simon C. and Kempenaers, Bart and Forstmeier, W} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31076"> <dc:contributor>Forstmeier, W</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-06-01T13:18:43Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Hemmrich-Stanisak, Georg</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Franke, Andre</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/> <dcterms:title>Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Forstmeier, W</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31076"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Kempenaers, Bart</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Franke, Andre</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Knief, Ulrich</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Griffith, Simon C.</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:contributor>Knief, Ulrich</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Hemmrich-Stanisak, Georg</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Wittig, Michael</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Wittig, Michael</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-06-01T13:18:43Z</dc:date> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Most molecular measures of inbreeding do not measure inbreeding at the scale that is most relevant for understanding inbreeding depression-namely the proportion of the genome that is identical-by-descent (IBD). The inbreeding coefficient FPed obtained from pedigrees is a valuable estimator of IBD, but pedigrees are not always available, and cannot capture inbreeding loops that reach back in time further than the pedigree. We here propose a molecular approach to quantify the realized proportion of the genome that is IBD (propIBD), and we apply this method to a wild and a captive population of zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). In each of 948 wild and 1057 captive individuals we analyzed available single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data (260 SNPs) spread over four different genomic regions in each population. This allowed us to determine whether any of these four regions was completely homozygous within an individual, which indicates IBD with high confidence. In the highly nomadic wild population, we did not find a single case of IBD, implying that inbreeding must be extremely rare (propIBD=0-0.00094, 95% CI). In the captive population, a five-generation pedigree strongly underestimated the average amount of realized inbreeding (FPed=0.013<propIBD=0.064), as expected given that pedigree founders were already related. We suggest that this SNP-based technique is generally useful for quantifying inbreeding at the individual or population level, and we show analytically that it can capture inbreeding loops that reach back up to a few hundred generations.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:contributor>Griffith, Simon C.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Kempenaers, Bart</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>