Publikation:

Grasping tools : effects of task and apraxia

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2009

Autor:innen

Li, Yong
Goldenberg, Georg
Hermsdörfer, Joachim

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Neuropsychologia. 2009, 47(2), pp. 497-505. ISSN 0028-3932. eISSN 1873-3514. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.005

Zusammenfassung

In patients with apraxia the ability to access tool-use-knowledge and to integrate it into a movement plan is frequently disturbed. The present study investigated potential differences between a 'transport'- and a 'use'-task as well as the influence of apraxia on the preceding grasping movement, when the tool is presented with its handle pointing away from the participant. 20 controls, 10 patients with right brain damage (RBD-group) and 17 patients with left brain damage (LBD-group) were tested. 10 LBD-patients were classified as moderately to severely apraxic according to erroneous demonstration of tool-use. Participants were asked to grasp the tool and either to demonstrate its typical 'use' or to 'transport' it into a container. Functional grasp, which enables comfortable use, was distinguished from non-functional grasp. The results showed that task-content influences the way to grasp an object. Apart from some LBD-patients, nearly all participants produced 100% functional grasps during the 'use'-task. Additionally inappropriate non-functional grasping has always been followed by apraxic tool-use behaviour. Compared to the 'use'-task in the 'transport'-task, functional grasping was significantly reduced in all groups. Our results imply that grasping a tool is specific to a task. Selection of the grasp type seems to be determined by individual weighting of several factors, including knowledge about the function of the object, structural tool characteristics, biomechanical costs of the movement, and previous experience. In general perception and integration of tool-structure plus specific tool-related functional knowledge are necessary for its use and might be processed synchronously. Patients with apraxic tool-use may fail to access any of these information resources.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Apraxia; Grasping; Tool-use; Action semantics; End-state comfort; Object structure

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690RANDERATH, Jennifer, Yong LI, Georg GOLDENBERG, Joachim HERMSDÖRFER, 2009. Grasping tools : effects of task and apraxia. In: Neuropsychologia. 2009, 47(2), pp. 497-505. ISSN 0028-3932. eISSN 1873-3514. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.005
BibTex
@article{Randerath2009-01Grasp-41392,
  year={2009},
  doi={10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.005},
  title={Grasping tools : effects of task and apraxia},
  number={2},
  volume={47},
  issn={0028-3932},
  journal={Neuropsychologia},
  pages={497--505},
  author={Randerath, Jennifer and Li, Yong and Goldenberg, Georg and Hermsdörfer, Joachim}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/41392">
    <dc:contributor>Hermsdörfer, Joachim</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Goldenberg, Georg</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-16T08:24:15Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Li, Yong</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Randerath, Jennifer</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2009-01</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/41392"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In patients with apraxia the ability to access tool-use-knowledge and to integrate it into a movement plan is frequently disturbed. The present study investigated potential differences between a 'transport'- and a 'use'-task as well as the influence of apraxia on the preceding grasping movement, when the tool is presented with its handle pointing away from the participant. 20 controls, 10 patients with right brain damage (RBD-group) and 17 patients with left brain damage (LBD-group) were tested. 10 LBD-patients were classified as moderately to severely apraxic according to erroneous demonstration of tool-use. Participants were asked to grasp the tool and either to demonstrate its typical 'use' or to 'transport' it into a container. Functional grasp, which enables comfortable use, was distinguished from non-functional grasp. The results showed that task-content influences the way to grasp an object. Apart from some LBD-patients, nearly all participants produced 100% functional grasps during the 'use'-task. Additionally inappropriate non-functional grasping has always been followed by apraxic tool-use behaviour. Compared to the 'use'-task in the 'transport'-task, functional grasping was significantly reduced in all groups. Our results imply that grasping a tool is specific to a task. Selection of the grasp type seems to be determined by individual weighting of several factors, including knowledge about the function of the object, structural tool characteristics, biomechanical costs of the movement, and previous experience. In general perception and integration of tool-structure plus specific tool-related functional knowledge are necessary for its use and might be processed synchronously. Patients with apraxic tool-use may fail to access any of these information resources.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Randerath, Jennifer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-02-16T08:24:15Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Goldenberg, Georg</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hermsdörfer, Joachim</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Li, Yong</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Grasping tools : effects of task and apraxia</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen