Publikation: Totally Between Subjectivity and Discourse : Exploring the Pragmatic Side of Intensification
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
In American English, the intensifier totally presents a pragmatic use, in which it strengthens the speaker’s commitment towards the utterance (e.g. ‘The Bulls will totally make the playoffs’). This use has received considerably less attention than the canonical lexical contribution of the adverb (e.g. ‘the glass is totally full’). First, I rely on three acceptability studies to show that pragmatic totally is used only in discourse moves that allow for the possibility of not adding p to the Common Ground of the conversation—that is, subjective, outlandish and responsive assertions. Second, I propose that totally flags speaker’s meta-conversational belief that every continuation of the exchange should involve the addition of p, framing the analysis within Farkas & Bruce (2010)’s discourse model. The proposal allows us to account in a unified way for the different effects that pragmatic totally contributes, highlighting the intensifier as a window into how declarative sentences with different kinds of content—subjective, objective, outlandish—structure the conversation.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BELTRAMA, Andrea, 2018. Totally Between Subjectivity and Discourse : Exploring the Pragmatic Side of Intensification. In: Journal of Semantics. 2018, 35(2), pp. 219-261. ISSN 0167-5133. eISSN 1477-4593. Available under: doi: 10.1093/semant/ffx021BibTex
@article{Beltrama2018-05-04Total-43228, year={2018}, doi={10.1093/semant/ffx021}, title={Totally Between Subjectivity and Discourse : Exploring the Pragmatic Side of Intensification}, number={2}, volume={35}, issn={0167-5133}, journal={Journal of Semantics}, pages={219--261}, author={Beltrama, Andrea} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43228"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/43228"/> <dc:creator>Beltrama, Andrea</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:title>Totally Between Subjectivity and Discourse : Exploring the Pragmatic Side of Intensification</dcterms:title> <dcterms:issued>2018-05-04</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-09-11T12:16:24Z</dcterms:available> <dc:contributor>Beltrama, Andrea</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-09-11T12:16:24Z</dc:date> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">In American English, the intensifier totally presents a pragmatic use, in which it strengthens the speaker’s commitment towards the utterance (e.g. ‘The Bulls will totally make the playoffs’). This use has received considerably less attention than the canonical lexical contribution of the adverb (e.g. ‘the glass is totally full’). First, I rely on three acceptability studies to show that pragmatic totally is used only in discourse moves that allow for the possibility of not adding p to the Common Ground of the conversation—that is, subjective, outlandish and responsive assertions. Second, I propose that totally flags speaker’s meta-conversational belief that every continuation of the exchange should involve the addition of p, framing the analysis within Farkas & Bruce (2010)’s discourse model. The proposal allows us to account in a unified way for the different effects that pragmatic totally contributes, highlighting the intensifier as a window into how declarative sentences with different kinds of content—subjective, objective, outlandish—structure the conversation.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>