Publikation:

Tracking and Incentives: A comment on Hanushek and Woessmann

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

TWI_Res_22.pdf
TWI_Res_22.pdfGröße: 440.36 KBDownloads: 582

Datum

2007

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Working Paper/Technical Report
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Zusammenfassung

This paper discusses the incentive effect of tracking policies in education. The results contradict the argument by Hanushek and Woessmann (2006), that differences-in-differences estimations capture the full impact of tracking. Such estimations capture the gain in education between the measurements but neglect the gains before the first measurement. In a standard incentive theory framework these gains and their variance differ systematically between tracking and comprehensive systems. In a selective educational system, most students will provide more effort in early education. Signaling considerations enhance this line of argument. As a result, educational tests alone do not reveal the efficiency and distributional aspects of educational policies sufficiently.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
330 Wirtschaft

Schlagwörter

Tracking, Selection, Educational Policy, Tracking, Selection

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690EISENKOPF, Gerald, 2007. Tracking and Incentives: A comment on Hanushek and Woessmann
BibTex
@techreport{Eisenkopf2007Track-11943,
  year={2007},
  series={Research paper series / Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut},
  title={Tracking and Incentives: A comment on Hanushek and Woessmann},
  number={22},
  author={Eisenkopf, Gerald}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/11943">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/11943/1/TWI_Res_22.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper discusses the incentive effect of tracking policies in education. The results contradict the argument by Hanushek and Woessmann (2006), that differences-in-differences estimations capture the full impact of tracking. Such estimations capture the gain in education between the measurements but neglect the gains before the first measurement. In a standard incentive theory framework these gains and their variance differ systematically between tracking and comprehensive systems. In a selective educational system, most students will provide more effort in early education. Signaling considerations enhance this line of argument. As a result, educational tests alone do not reveal the efficiency and distributional aspects of educational policies sufficiently.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2007</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:41:15Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Eisenkopf, Gerald</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-25T09:41:15Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Eisenkopf, Gerald</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/11943/1/TWI_Res_22.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/11943"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:title>Tracking and Incentives: A comment on Hanushek and Woessmann</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/46"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen