Publikation:

No general percid dominance at mesotrophic lake conditions : insights from the quantification of predator-prey interactions

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Haertel_etal_Limnologica_2002.pdf
Haertel_etal_Limnologica_2002.pdfGröße: 1.31 MBDownloads: 526

Datum

2002

Autor:innen

Haertel, Susanne
Baade, Ulrich

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Limnologica. 2002, 32(1), pp. 0, 1-13. ISSN 0075-9511. Available under: doi: 10.1016/S0075-9511(02)80011-1

Zusammenfassung

Contrasting to predictions, roach (Rutilus rutilus) are more abundant than perch (Perca fluviatilis)in a number of mesotrophic lakes in the Baltic lake region of northeastern Germany. To reveal underlying mechanisms, roach and perch habitat use were analysed on a diel and seasonal scale, and piscivorous fish predation was quantified in one of those lakes, Lake Grosser Vätersee (Brandenburg). For the latter point, piscivorous and non-piscivorous fish population sizes were assessed by multiple mark-recapture experiments and piscivorous consumption was quantified by bioenergetics modelling. Piscivorous fish biomass accounted for about 30% of total fish biomass, and top-down control of third trophic level biomass was intense. Fish habitat shifts closely linked the littoral and pelagic habitat, and were an integral component of the fish species interactions. While pike predation was mainly restricted to the littoral zone, piscivorous perch foraged in the open water during daytime. Roach _> age-1 counteracted the pelagic predation risk by diel horizontal migrations. So they could prey on pelagic zooplankton, and at the same time kept their predation risk in the pelagic zone as low as possible. In the littoral zone, roach extensively used non-animal resources not accessible to perch. Non-piscivorous perch were almost exclusively restricted to the littoral habitat; only age-0 perch had an initial pelagic stage. They didn't experience a juvenile competitive bottleneck. Overall, perch were relatively more affected by piscivorous fish predation than roach. This might be decisive for roach dominance under mesotrophic conditions. Additionally, Orconectes limosus, an introduced crayfish species, played as decisive role both as alternative prey for piscivorous fish and as a potential structuring force in the littoral habitat.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie

Schlagwörter

roach, perch, Orcomectes limosus, abundance, biomass, consumption, predation pressure, species interaction, habitat

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690HAERTEL, Susanne, Ulrich BAADE, Reiner ECKMANN, 2002. No general percid dominance at mesotrophic lake conditions : insights from the quantification of predator-prey interactions. In: Limnologica. 2002, 32(1), pp. 0, 1-13. ISSN 0075-9511. Available under: doi: 10.1016/S0075-9511(02)80011-1
BibTex
@article{Haertel2002gener-7109,
  year={2002},
  doi={10.1016/S0075-9511(02)80011-1},
  title={No general percid dominance at mesotrophic lake conditions : insights from the quantification of predator-prey interactions},
  number={1},
  volume={32},
  issn={0075-9511},
  journal={Limnologica},
  pages={0, 1--13},
  author={Haertel, Susanne and Baade, Ulrich and Eckmann, Reiner}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/7109">
    <dcterms:issued>2002</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/7109/1/Haertel_etal_Limnologica_2002.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Haertel, Susanne</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:contributor>Baade, Ulrich</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Eckmann, Reiner</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/7109/1/Haertel_etal_Limnologica_2002.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/7109"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:31:33Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Haertel, Susanne</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Limnologica 32 (2002), pp. 01-13</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Contrasting to predictions, roach (Rutilus rutilus) are more abundant than perch (Perca fluviatilis)in a number of mesotrophic lakes in the Baltic lake region of northeastern Germany. To reveal underlying mechanisms, roach and perch habitat use were analysed on a diel and seasonal scale, and piscivorous fish predation was quantified in one of those lakes, Lake Grosser Vätersee (Brandenburg). For the latter point, piscivorous and non-piscivorous fish population sizes were assessed by multiple mark-recapture experiments and piscivorous consumption was quantified by bioenergetics modelling. Piscivorous fish biomass accounted for about 30% of total fish biomass, and top-down control of third trophic level biomass was intense. Fish habitat shifts closely linked the littoral and pelagic habitat, and were an integral component of the fish species interactions. While pike predation was mainly restricted to the littoral zone, piscivorous perch foraged in the open water during daytime. Roach _&gt; age-1 counteracted the pelagic predation risk by diel horizontal migrations. So they could prey on pelagic zooplankton, and at the same time kept their predation risk in the pelagic zone as low as possible. In the littoral zone, roach extensively used non-animal resources not accessible to perch. Non-piscivorous perch were almost exclusively restricted to the littoral habitat; only age-0 perch had an initial pelagic stage. They didn't experience a juvenile competitive bottleneck. Overall, perch were relatively more affected by piscivorous fish predation than roach. This might be decisive for roach dominance under mesotrophic conditions. Additionally, Orconectes limosus, an introduced crayfish species, played as decisive role both as alternative prey for piscivorous fish and as a potential structuring force in the littoral habitat.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-24T17:31:33Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>No general percid dominance at mesotrophic lake conditions : insights from the quantification of predator-prey interactions</dcterms:title>
    <dc:contributor>Eckmann, Reiner</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Baade, Ulrich</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen