Publikation: Ist Philosophie eine Wissenschaft?
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
I give a positive answer to the title question - by defending six claims: (1) Philosophy must in any case maintain the claim to be a scientific discipline. (2) There are many close relations between philosophy and specific disciplines showing that they are at least similar in kind; all are part of our best ways of theorizing about the world. (3) There is a lot of 'normal science' in philosophy, not less useful than other normal science. (4) This has the effect of raising the scholarly standards in philosophy. (5) There is still progress and improvement in philosophy, even concerning the 'big questions', but only with the help of 'scientific' methods. (6) There is a peculiar dialectics between the philosophy of big questions and the philosophy as normal science; both depend on one another.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
SPOHN, Wolfgang, 2005. Ist Philosophie eine Wissenschaft?. GAP.5. Bielefeld, 22. Sept. 2003 - 26. Sept. 2003. In: Philosophie und / als Wissenschaft : Hauptvorträge und Kolloquiumsbeiträge zu GAP.5, Fünfter Internationaler Kongress der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie, Bielefeld, 22.- 26. Sept. 2003. Paderborn: Mentis-Verl., 2005, pp. 81-96BibTex
@inproceedings{Spohn2005Philo-3442, year={2005}, title={Ist Philosophie eine Wissenschaft?}, publisher={Mentis-Verl.}, address={Paderborn}, booktitle={Philosophie und / als Wissenschaft : Hauptvorträge und Kolloquiumsbeiträge zu GAP.5, Fünfter Internationaler Kongress der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie, Bielefeld, 22.- 26. Sept. 2003}, pages={81--96}, author={Spohn, Wolfgang} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3442"> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic</dc:rights> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Zuerst ersch. in: Philosophie und/als Wissenschaft: Hauptvorträge und Kolloquiumsbeiträge zu GAP.5, Fünfter Internationaler Kongress der Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie, Bielefeld, 22.-26. Sept. 2003. - Paderborn: Mentis-Verl., 2005, S. 81-96</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3442/1/Spohn_2005_Ist_Philosophie_eine.pdf"/> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:contributor>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3442"/> <dcterms:issued>2005</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>deu</dc:language> <dcterms:title>Ist Philosophie eine Wissenschaft?</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Spohn, Wolfgang</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:22Z</dc:date> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/3442/1/Spohn_2005_Ist_Philosophie_eine.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T13:46:22Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">I give a positive answer to the title question - by defending six claims: (1) Philosophy must in any case maintain the claim to be a scientific discipline. (2) There are many close relations between philosophy and specific disciplines showing that they are at least similar in kind; all are part of our best ways of theorizing about the world. (3) There is a lot of 'normal science' in philosophy, not less useful than other normal science. (4) This has the effect of raising the scholarly standards in philosophy. (5) There is still progress and improvement in philosophy, even concerning the 'big questions', but only with the help of 'scientific' methods. (6) There is a peculiar dialectics between the philosophy of big questions and the philosophy as normal science; both depend on one another.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>