Publikation:

Transfer function analysis for clinical evaluation of dynamic cerebral autoregulation : a comparison between spontaneous and respiratory-induced oscillations

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Reinhard_272533.pdf
Reinhard_272533.pdfGröße: 654.75 KBDownloads: 439

Datum

2003

Autor:innen

Reinhard, Matthias
Guschlbauer, Brigitte
Timmer, Jens
Hetzel, Andreas

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Physiological Measurement. 2003, 24(1), pp. 27-43. ISSN 0967-3334. eISSN 1361-6579. Available under: doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/24/1/303

Zusammenfassung

Oscillations of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) can be used for non-invasive assessment of cerebral autoregulation using transfer function analysis. Either spontaneous oscillations (SPO) around 0.1 Hz or respiratory induced oscillations during deep breathing (DB) at a rate of 6/min have been used so far. We investigated 168 patients with severe carotid stenosis or occlusion to evaluate transfer function analysis and compare the SPO and DB approaches. ABP was assessed non-invasively (Finapres), CBFV was measured in the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler sonography. Transfer function phase (P) and gain (G) were extracted from the respective spectra in a low (0.06-0.12 Hz) and high (0.20-0.30 Hz) frequency range (LF, HF) of SPO and from the 0.1 (LF) and 0.2 (HF) Hz peaks induced by DB. For SPO, significant side-to-side differences and differences between groups of severe and critical stenosis were found for P(LF), while P(HF) did not prove to be a significant parameter. G(LF) showed significant side-to-side differences, while G(HF) additionally differed significantly between severe and critical stenosis and occlusion, respectively. For DB, significant side-to-side differences were found for P(LF, HF). Mainly G(HF) differed significantly between the affected and contralateral sides, while both HF and LF gains showed lower values in groups with a higher degree of stenosis. Correlation between G and P values was generally poor. Using Bland-Altman plots a poor inter-method agreement was found mainly for P. Correlations between SPO and DB were higher for G than for P (LF r = 0.64 versus 0.44, HF 0.69 versus 0.28). Analysing reproducibility in 16 patients, only for P(LF, HF) of DB was a highly significant correlation found (Spearman's r up to 0.78). For G(LF, HF) correlations were significant for both SPO and DB with slightly higher r coefficients for SPO. In conclusion, the present study showed that (1) transfer functions P and G represent different information for characterization of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in the frequency domain. (2) Inter-method agreement between DB and SPO is poor for P and moderate for G values. (3) P extracted from DB has a higher reproducibility. (4) The extraction of P and G from the SPO phase spectra is critical and future work on standardizing this process is needed. (5) At present, the DB protocol might be slightly advantageous as a routine diagnostic tool.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

Aged, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Pressure, Brain, Carbon Dioxide, Carotid Stenosis, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Female, Heart Rate, Homeostasis, Humans, Inhalation, Male, Oscillometry, Partial Pressure, Patient Selection, Respiratory Mechanics, Supine Position

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690REINHARD, Matthias, Thomas MÜLLER, Brigitte GUSCHLBAUER, Jens TIMMER, Andreas HETZEL, 2003. Transfer function analysis for clinical evaluation of dynamic cerebral autoregulation : a comparison between spontaneous and respiratory-induced oscillations. In: Physiological Measurement. 2003, 24(1), pp. 27-43. ISSN 0967-3334. eISSN 1361-6579. Available under: doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/24/1/303
BibTex
@article{Reinhard2003Trans-27253,
  year={2003},
  doi={10.1088/0967-3334/24/1/303},
  title={Transfer function analysis for clinical evaluation of dynamic cerebral autoregulation : a comparison between spontaneous and respiratory-induced oscillations},
  number={1},
  volume={24},
  issn={0967-3334},
  journal={Physiological Measurement},
  pages={27--43},
  author={Reinhard, Matthias and Müller, Thomas and Guschlbauer, Brigitte and Timmer, Jens and Hetzel, Andreas}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/27253">
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Reinhard, Matthias</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2003</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:contributor>Guschlbauer, Brigitte</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Timmer, Jens</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Hetzel, Andreas</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Oscillations of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) can be used for non-invasive assessment of cerebral autoregulation using transfer function analysis. Either spontaneous oscillations (SPO) around 0.1 Hz or respiratory induced oscillations during deep breathing (DB) at a rate of 6/min have been used so far. We investigated 168 patients with severe carotid stenosis or occlusion to evaluate transfer function analysis and compare the SPO and DB approaches. ABP was assessed non-invasively (Finapres), CBFV was measured in the middle cerebral artery using transcranial Doppler sonography. Transfer function phase (P) and gain (G) were extracted from the respective spectra in a low (0.06-0.12 Hz) and high (0.20-0.30 Hz) frequency range (LF, HF) of SPO and from the 0.1 (LF) and 0.2 (HF) Hz peaks induced by DB. For SPO, significant side-to-side differences and differences between groups of severe and critical stenosis were found for P(LF), while P(HF) did not prove to be a significant parameter. G(LF) showed significant side-to-side differences, while G(HF) additionally differed significantly between severe and critical stenosis and occlusion, respectively. For DB, significant side-to-side differences were found for P(LF, HF). Mainly G(HF) differed significantly between the affected and contralateral sides, while both HF and LF gains showed lower values in groups with a higher degree of stenosis. Correlation between G and P values was generally poor. Using Bland-Altman plots a poor inter-method agreement was found mainly for P. Correlations between SPO and DB were higher for G than for P (LF r = 0.64 versus 0.44, HF 0.69 versus 0.28). Analysing reproducibility in 16 patients, only for P(LF, HF) of DB was a highly significant correlation found (Spearman's r up to 0.78). For G(LF, HF) correlations were significant for both SPO and DB with slightly higher r coefficients for SPO. In conclusion, the present study showed that (1) transfer functions P and G represent different information for characterization of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in the frequency domain. (2) Inter-method agreement between DB and SPO is poor for P and moderate for G values. (3) P extracted from DB has a higher reproducibility. (4) The extraction of P and G from the SPO phase spectra is critical and future work on standardizing this process is needed. (5) At present, the DB protocol might be slightly advantageous as a routine diagnostic tool.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Timmer, Jens</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/27253/2/Reinhard_272533.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/27253/2/Reinhard_272533.pdf"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-04-03T08:22:48Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Reinhard, Matthias</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Guschlbauer, Brigitte</dc:creator>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:title>Transfer function analysis for clinical evaluation of dynamic cerebral autoregulation : a comparison between spontaneous and respiratory-induced oscillations</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Müller, Thomas</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2014-04-03T08:22:48Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Hetzel, Andreas</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Müller, Thomas</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Physiological measurement ; 24 (2003), 1. - S. 27-43</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/27253"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen