Publikation:

Neoliberal Institutionalism and Neofunctionalism in Latin American Security Studies

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2015

Autor:innen

Malamud, Andres

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

MARES, David R., ed., Arie M. KACOWICZ, ed.. Routledge handbook of Latin American security. London: Routledge, 2015, pp. 44-55. ISBN 978-0-415-71869-1. Available under: doi: 10.4324/9781315867908.ch3

Zusammenfassung

Unlike realism–which posits survival and power as drivers and balance as mechanism–and constructivism–which posits ideas and identities as drivers and human interaction as mechanism–neoliberal institutionalism and neofunctionalism are two subsets of liberalism that focus on interests as drivers and institutions as mechanisms in determining preference formation and decision-making. In so doing, they offer a better explanation of international cooperation, integration processes, and institutional development than their theoretical alternatives. However, both theories differ in terms of level of analysis, key actors, and the causal mechanisms through which institutions are expected to condition policy outcomes.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690MALAMUD, Andres, Luis SCHENONI, 2015. Neoliberal Institutionalism and Neofunctionalism in Latin American Security Studies. In: MARES, David R., ed., Arie M. KACOWICZ, ed.. Routledge handbook of Latin American security. London: Routledge, 2015, pp. 44-55. ISBN 978-0-415-71869-1. Available under: doi: 10.4324/9781315867908.ch3
BibTex
@incollection{Malamud2015Neoli-52325,
  year={2015},
  doi={10.4324/9781315867908.ch3},
  title={Neoliberal Institutionalism and Neofunctionalism in Latin American Security Studies},
  isbn={978-0-415-71869-1},
  publisher={Routledge},
  address={London},
  booktitle={Routledge handbook of Latin American security},
  pages={44--55},
  editor={Mares, David R. and Kacowicz, Arie M.},
  author={Malamud, Andres and Schenoni, Luis}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52325">
    <dc:contributor>Malamud, Andres</dc:contributor>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-08T12:40:12Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:title>Neoliberal Institutionalism and Neofunctionalism in Latin American Security Studies</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Unlike realism–which posits survival and power as drivers and balance as mechanism–and constructivism–which posits ideas and identities as drivers and human interaction as mechanism–neoliberal institutionalism and neofunctionalism are two subsets of liberalism that focus on interests as drivers and institutions as mechanisms in determining preference formation and decision-making. In so doing, they offer a better explanation of international cooperation, integration processes, and institutional development than their theoretical alternatives. However, both theories differ in terms of level of analysis, key actors, and the causal mechanisms through which institutions are expected to condition policy outcomes.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Malamud, Andres</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/52325"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-01-08T12:40:12Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Schenoni, Luis</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Schenoni, Luis</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen