Publikation:

A Study on Hume's Theory of Justice : Evolution, Utilitarianism, and the Social Contract

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Fior-Mota-de-Andrade_2-v9mugxliogo28.pdf
Fior-Mota-de-Andrade_2-v9mugxliogo28.pdfGröße: 1.51 MBDownloads: 818

Datum

2020

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Dissertation
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Zusammenfassung

This study aims to provide the correct interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice. The study on the nature of justice is of the utmost importance for comprehending Hume’s moral philosophy, for I argue that the virtue of justice is the central concept of his moral theory. In this sense, any plausible interpretation of this moral theory must take into account the nature of the virtue of justice as a priority in Hume. In the tradition, Hume scholars have come up with three main lines of interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice: i) the evolutionary interpretation, ii) the rule-utilitarian interpretation, and iii) the contractarian interpretation. Each of these lines of interpretation emphasizes a particular perspective adopted by Hume to explain the virtue of justice in his theory. And each of the three lines of interpretation makes some plausible points and relevant contributions to a better comprehension of the different parts of Hume’s theory of justice. To settle the interpretative dispute between the three lines of interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice, I assess them by their degrees of plausibility in face of the textual evidence in Hume’s work. In this way, I attempt to develop a correct interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice from the most plausible line of interpretation ascertained by this study.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

Hume, Theory of Justice, Evolution, Utilitarianism, Contractarianism

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690FIOR MOTA DE ANDRADE, Pedro, 2020. A Study on Hume's Theory of Justice : Evolution, Utilitarianism, and the Social Contract [Dissertation]. Konstanz: University of Konstanz
BibTex
@phdthesis{FiorMotadeAndrade2020Study-50538,
  year={2020},
  title={A Study on Hume's Theory of Justice : Evolution, Utilitarianism, and the Social Contract},
  author={Fior Mota de Andrade, Pedro},
  address={Konstanz},
  school={Universität Konstanz}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50538">
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-20T07:22:45Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>Fior Mota de Andrade, Pedro</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50538/3/Fior-Mota-de-Andrade_2-v9mugxliogo28.pdf"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50538/3/Fior-Mota-de-Andrade_2-v9mugxliogo28.pdf"/>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-20T07:22:45Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>A Study on Hume's Theory of Justice : Evolution, Utilitarianism, and the Social Contract</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50538"/>
    <dc:contributor>Fior Mota de Andrade, Pedro</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This study aims to provide the correct interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice. The study on the nature of justice is of the utmost importance for comprehending Hume’s moral philosophy, for I argue that the virtue of justice is the central concept of his moral theory. In this sense, any plausible interpretation of this moral theory must take into account the nature of the virtue of justice as a priority in Hume. In the tradition, Hume scholars have come up with three main lines of interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice: i) the evolutionary interpretation, ii) the rule-utilitarian interpretation, and iii) the contractarian interpretation. Each of these lines of interpretation emphasizes a particular perspective adopted by Hume to explain the virtue of justice in his theory. And each of the three lines of interpretation makes some plausible points and relevant contributions to a better comprehension of the different parts of Hume’s theory of justice. To settle the interpretative dispute between the three lines of interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice, I assess them by their degrees of plausibility in face of the textual evidence in Hume’s work. In this way, I attempt to develop a correct interpretation of Hume’s theory of justice from the most plausible line of interpretation ascertained by this study.</dcterms:abstract>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

July 10, 2020
Hochschulschriftenvermerk
Konstanz, Univ., Diss., 2020
Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen