Publikation: Friendly Takeover, or: the Power of the ‘First Word’ : The German Constitutional Court Embraces the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Domestic Judicial Review
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Five decades of interaction between the Bundesverfassungsgericht and the Court of Justice – Reversal of the Solange decisions – Jurisdictional upgrade of the Charter under domestic constitutional law – Continuity of the ultra vires and constitutional identity caveats – Differences between the First and Second Senate in the approach towards EU law – Preliminary references as a new normality – Projection of the experience and doctrinal rigour of the German fundamental rights case law on the European level – ‘Primary’ application of the Grundgesetz as pragmatic guidance – Gradual evolution of overarching standards – Ordinary courts as an institutional counterbalance to the Bundesverfassungsgericht – Insistence on leeway for relative national autonomy in the interpretation and application of the Charter.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
THYM, Daniel, 2020. Friendly Takeover, or: the Power of the ‘First Word’ : The German Constitutional Court Embraces the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Domestic Judicial Review. In: European Constitutional Law Review. Cambridge University Press. 2020, 16(2), pp. 187-212. ISSN 1574-0196. eISSN 1744-5515. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S1574019620000127BibTex
@article{Thym2020-07-09Frien-50567, year={2020}, doi={10.1017/S1574019620000127}, title={Friendly Takeover, or: the Power of the ‘First Word’ : The German Constitutional Court Embraces the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Domestic Judicial Review}, number={2}, volume={16}, issn={1574-0196}, journal={European Constitutional Law Review}, pages={187--212}, author={Thym, Daniel} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/50567"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-25T13:07:53Z</dc:date> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50567/1/Thym_2-ux6jfnhxlo4n6.pdf"/> <dcterms:title>Friendly Takeover, or: the Power of the ‘First Word’ : The German Constitutional Court Embraces the Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Standard of Domestic Judicial Review</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:issued>2020-07-09</dcterms:issued> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/50567/1/Thym_2-ux6jfnhxlo4n6.pdf"/> <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Thym, Daniel</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Five decades of interaction between the Bundesverfassungsgericht and the Court of Justice – Reversal of the Solange decisions – Jurisdictional upgrade of the Charter under domestic constitutional law – Continuity of the ultra vires and constitutional identity caveats – Differences between the First and Second Senate in the approach towards EU law – Preliminary references as a new normality – Projection of the experience and doctrinal rigour of the German fundamental rights case law on the European level – ‘Primary’ application of the Grundgesetz as pragmatic guidance – Gradual evolution of overarching standards – Ordinary courts as an institutional counterbalance to the Bundesverfassungsgericht – Insistence on leeway for relative national autonomy in the interpretation and application of the Charter.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/50567"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-08-25T13:07:53Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Thym, Daniel</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>