Publikation: The time course of processing perfective and imperfective aspect in Polish : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking experiments
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
This paper is a contribution to a long-standing discussion related to the domain of aspectual interpretation. More precisely, it focuses on the impact of the degree of specificity and morphological complexity on the time course of processing of perfective (prefixed perfective and semelfactive perfective) and imperfective (simple imperfective and iterative imperfective) verbs in Polish. In two experiments, eye-tracking during reading and self-paced reading, we tested a hypothesis based on Frisson & Pickering (1999), Pickering & Frisson (2001), and Frisson (2009) that the interpretation of semantically underspecified verbs should be delayed to the end of a sentence. As predicted, in both of the reported experiments significantly longer reading measures were observed for aspectually underspecified simple imperfective verbs as compared to aspectually more specific perfective verbs in the sentence-final region. Our second major prediction was that morphological complexity of aspectual forms should cause computational cost directly on the verbal region. As predicted, significantly longer reading times were observed on morphologically complex (prefixed) perfective verbs and (suffixed) semelfactive perfective verbs as compared to their morphologically simple imperfective counterparts in the eye-tracking experiment. This effect was not confirmed in the self-paced reading experiment. This difference between the results in the two reported experiments is attributed to the differences between the methods used.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
KLIMEK-JANKOWSKA, Dorota, Anna CZYPIONKA, Wojciech WITKOWSKI, Joanna BŁASZCZAK, 2018. The time course of processing perfective and imperfective aspect in Polish : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking experiments. In: Acta Linguistica Academica. 2018, 65(2-3), pp. 293-351. ISSN 2559-8201. eISSN 2560-1016. Available under: doi: 10.1556/2062.2018.65.2-3.4BibTex
@article{KlimekJankowska2018-06cours-44068, year={2018}, doi={10.1556/2062.2018.65.2-3.4}, title={The time course of processing perfective and imperfective aspect in Polish : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking experiments}, number={2-3}, volume={65}, issn={2559-8201}, journal={Acta Linguistica Academica}, pages={293--351}, author={Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota and Czypionka, Anna and Witkowski, Wojciech and Błaszczak, Joanna} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44068"> <dc:contributor>Czypionka, Anna</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/44068"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-11-29T11:23:56Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:issued>2018-06</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2018-11-29T11:23:56Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:creator>Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Błaszczak, Joanna</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Witkowski, Wojciech</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Witkowski, Wojciech</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>The time course of processing perfective and imperfective aspect in Polish : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye-tracking experiments</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">This paper is a contribution to a long-standing discussion related to the domain of aspectual interpretation. More precisely, it focuses on the impact of the degree of specificity and morphological complexity on the time course of processing of perfective (prefixed perfective and semelfactive perfective) and imperfective (simple imperfective and iterative imperfective) verbs in Polish. In two experiments, eye-tracking during reading and self-paced reading, we tested a hypothesis based on Frisson & Pickering (1999), Pickering & Frisson (2001), and Frisson (2009) that the interpretation of semantically underspecified verbs should be delayed to the end of a sentence. As predicted, in both of the reported experiments significantly longer reading measures were observed for aspectually underspecified simple imperfective verbs as compared to aspectually more specific perfective verbs in the sentence-final region. Our second major prediction was that morphological complexity of aspectual forms should cause computational cost directly on the verbal region. As predicted, significantly longer reading times were observed on morphologically complex (prefixed) perfective verbs and (suffixed) semelfactive perfective verbs as compared to their morphologically simple imperfective counterparts in the eye-tracking experiment. This effect was not confirmed in the self-paced reading experiment. This difference between the results in the two reported experiments is attributed to the differences between the methods used.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Błaszczak, Joanna</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Czypionka, Anna</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>