Publikation:

Patterns of Emotional Tweets : The Case of Brexit After the Referendum Results

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Bouko, Catherine

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

BOUVIER, Gwen, ed., Judith E. ROSENBAUM, ed.. Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, pp. 175-203. ISBN 978-3-030-41423-8. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_8

Zusammenfassung

With the public sphere conceptualized as consisting of rational, deliberate dialogue, affective responses are often excluded from any considerations of social media’s role in democracy. This chapter aims to extend our understanding of the role played by Twitter in contemporary democracy by considering it as a public space that allows emotion-laden expression to promote democratic progress. Using a quantitative content analysis combined with a text-based analysis of tweets centered on the outcome of the Brexit referendum, this chapter shows how Twitter serves as a public space that does not allow for true dialogue, with responses to the referendum often combining affect, appreciation, and judgment, thereby reflecting and augmenting political polarization.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Emotion, political polarization, discourse, Brexit, LIWC

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BOUKO, Catherine, David GARCIA, 2020. Patterns of Emotional Tweets : The Case of Brexit After the Referendum Results. In: BOUVIER, Gwen, ed., Judith E. ROSENBAUM, ed.. Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, pp. 175-203. ISBN 978-3-030-41423-8. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_8
BibTex
@incollection{Bouko2020Patte-66228,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_8},
  title={Patterns of Emotional Tweets : The Case of Brexit After the Referendum Results},
  isbn={978-3-030-41423-8},
  publisher={Palgrave Macmillan},
  address={Cham},
  booktitle={Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation},
  pages={175--203},
  editor={Bouvier, Gwen and Rosenbaum, Judith E.},
  author={Bouko, Catherine and Garcia, David}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/66228">
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Garcia, David</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Bouko, Catherine</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/66228"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">With the public sphere conceptualized as consisting of rational, deliberate dialogue, affective responses are often excluded from any considerations of social media’s role in democracy. This chapter aims to extend our understanding of the role played by Twitter in contemporary democracy by considering it as a public space that allows emotion-laden expression to promote democratic progress. Using a quantitative content analysis combined with a text-based analysis of tweets centered on the outcome of the Brexit referendum, this chapter shows how Twitter serves as a public space that does not allow for true dialogue, with responses to the referendum often combining affect, appreciation, and judgment, thereby reflecting and augmenting political polarization.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-02-28T14:39:42Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Bouko, Catherine</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>Patterns of Emotional Tweets : The Case of Brexit After the Referendum Results</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Garcia, David</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-02-28T14:39:42Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen