Publikation:

A conceptual map of invasion biology : Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Enders_2-tk6xik1s8u604.pdf
Enders_2-tk6xik1s8u604.pdfGröße: 814.22 KBDownloads: 265

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Enders, Martin
Havemann, Frank
Ruland, Florian
Bernard-Verdier, Maud
Catford, Jane A.
Gómez-Aparicio, Lorena
Haider, Sylvia
Heger, Tina
Kueffer, Christoph
et al.

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Global Ecology and Biogeography. Wiley. 2020, 29(6), pp. 978-991. ISSN 1466-822X. eISSN 1466-8238. Available under: doi: 10.1111/geb.13082

Zusammenfassung

Background and aims
Since its emergence in the mid‐20th century, invasion biology has matured into a productive research field addressing questions of fundamental and applied importance. Not only has the number of empirical studies increased through time, but also has the number of competing, overlapping and, in some cases, contradictory hypotheses about biological invasions. To make these contradictions and redundancies explicit, and to gain insight into the field’s current theoretical structure, we developed and applied a Delphi approach to create a consensus network of 39 existing invasion hypotheses.

Results
The resulting network was analysed with a link‐clustering algorithm that revealed five concept clusters (resource availability, biotic interaction, propagule, trait and Darwin’s clusters) representing complementary areas in the theory of invasion biology. The network also displays hypotheses that link two or more clusters, called connecting hypotheses, which are important in determining network structure. The network indicates hypotheses that are logically linked either positively (77 connections of support) or negatively (that is, they contradict each other; 6 connections).

Significance
The network visually synthesizes how invasion biology’s predominant hypotheses are conceptually related to each other, and thus, reveals an emergent structure – a conceptual map – that can serve as a navigation tool for scholars, practitioners and students, both inside and outside of the field of invasion biology, and guide the development of a more coherent foundation of theory. Additionally, the outlined approach can be more widely applied to create a conceptual map for the larger fields of ecology and biogeography.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690ENDERS, Martin, Frank HAVEMANN, Florian RULAND, Maud BERNARD-VERDIER, Jane A. CATFORD, Lorena GÓMEZ-APARICIO, Sylvia HAIDER, Tina HEGER, Christoph KUEFFER, Mark VAN KLEUNEN, 2020. A conceptual map of invasion biology : Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network. In: Global Ecology and Biogeography. Wiley. 2020, 29(6), pp. 978-991. ISSN 1466-822X. eISSN 1466-8238. Available under: doi: 10.1111/geb.13082
BibTex
@article{Enders2020-06conce-49380,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1111/geb.13082},
  title={A conceptual map of invasion biology : Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network},
  number={6},
  volume={29},
  issn={1466-822X},
  journal={Global Ecology and Biogeography},
  pages={978--991},
  author={Enders, Martin and Havemann, Frank and Ruland, Florian and Bernard-Verdier, Maud and Catford, Jane A. and Gómez-Aparicio, Lorena and Haider, Sylvia and Heger, Tina and Kueffer, Christoph and van Kleunen, Mark}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/49380">
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Enders, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Gómez-Aparicio, Lorena</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Gómez-Aparicio, Lorena</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Background and aims&lt;br /&gt;Since its emergence in the mid‐20th century, invasion biology has matured into a productive research field addressing questions of fundamental and applied importance. Not only has the number of empirical studies increased through time, but also has the number of competing, overlapping and, in some cases, contradictory hypotheses about biological invasions. To make these contradictions and redundancies explicit, and to gain insight into the field’s current theoretical structure, we developed and applied a Delphi approach to create a consensus network of 39 existing invasion hypotheses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results&lt;br /&gt;The resulting network was analysed with a link‐clustering algorithm that revealed five concept clusters (resource availability, biotic interaction, propagule, trait and Darwin’s clusters) representing complementary areas in the theory of invasion biology. The network also displays hypotheses that link two or more clusters, called connecting hypotheses, which are important in determining network structure. The network indicates hypotheses that are logically linked either positively (77 connections of support) or negatively (that is, they contradict each other; 6 connections).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Significance&lt;br /&gt;The network visually synthesizes how invasion biology’s predominant hypotheses are conceptually related to each other, and thus, reveals an emergent structure – a conceptual map – that can serve as a navigation tool for scholars, practitioners and students, both inside and outside of the field of invasion biology, and guide the development of a more coherent foundation of theory. Additionally, the outlined approach can be more widely applied to create a conceptual map for the larger fields of ecology and biogeography.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:contributor>Catford, Jane A.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Haider, Sylvia</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Ruland, Florian</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/49380"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/49380/1/Enders_2-tk6xik1s8u604.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>van Kleunen, Mark</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:contributor>Heger, Tina</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Havemann, Frank</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Kueffer, Christoph</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Havemann, Frank</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Ruland, Florian</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:creator>van Kleunen, Mark</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-06</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-05-04T13:18:50Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Kueffer, Christoph</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:creator>Catford, Jane A.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bernard-Verdier, Maud</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-05-04T13:18:50Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Bernard-Verdier, Maud</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/49380/1/Enders_2-tk6xik1s8u604.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Heger, Tina</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:title>A conceptual map of invasion biology : Integrating hypotheses into a consensus network</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Enders, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Haider, Sylvia</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen