Where Does Political Polarization Come From? : Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate

dc.contributor.authorFisher, Dana R.
dc.contributor.authorWaggle, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorLeifeld, Philip
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-02T10:22:25Z
dc.date.available2015-02-02T10:22:25Z
dc.date.issued2013eng
dc.description.abstractHow do we understand political polarization within the U.S. climate change debate? This article unpacks the different components of the debate to determine the source of the political divide that is so noted in the mainstream media and academic literatures. Through analysis of the content of congressional hearings on the issue of climate change, we are able to explain political polarization of the issue more fully. In particular, our results show that, contrary to representations in the mainstream media, there is increasing consensus over the science of the issue. Discussions of the type of policy instrument and the economic implications of regulating carbon dioxide emissions, however, continue to polarize opinion. This article concludes by exploring how these findings help us understand more recent political events around climate change.eng
dc.description.versionpublished
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0002764212463360eng
dc.identifier.urihttp://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/29699
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.subjectclimate change, political discourse, social network analysis, United States, U.S. Congresseng
dc.subject.ddc320eng
dc.titleWhere Does Political Polarization Come From? : Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debateeng
dc.typeJOURNAL_ARTICLEeng
dspace.entity.typePublication
kops.citation.bibtex
@article{Fisher2013Where-29699,
  year={2013},
  doi={10.1177/0002764212463360},
  title={Where Does Political Polarization Come From? : Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate},
  number={1},
  volume={57},
  issn={0002-7642},
  journal={American Behavioral Scientist},
  pages={70--92},
  author={Fisher, Dana R. and Waggle, Joseph and Leifeld, Philip}
}
kops.citation.iso690FISHER, Dana R., Joseph WAGGLE, Philip LEIFELD, 2013. Where Does Political Polarization Come From? : Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate. In: American Behavioral Scientist. 2013, 57(1), pp. 70-92. ISSN 0002-7642. eISSN 1552-3381. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0002764212463360deu
kops.citation.iso690FISHER, Dana R., Joseph WAGGLE, Philip LEIFELD, 2013. Where Does Political Polarization Come From? : Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate. In: American Behavioral Scientist. 2013, 57(1), pp. 70-92. ISSN 0002-7642. eISSN 1552-3381. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0002764212463360eng
kops.citation.rdf
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/29699">
    <dc:creator>Leifeld, Philip</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Waggle, Joseph</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Fisher, Dana R.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Leifeld, Philip</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:title>Where Does Political Polarization Come From? : Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/29699"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-02T10:22:25Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">How do we understand political polarization within the U.S. climate change debate? This article unpacks the different components of the debate to determine the source of the political divide that is so noted in the mainstream media and academic literatures. Through analysis of the content of congressional hearings on the issue of climate change, we are able to explain political polarization of the issue more fully. In particular, our results show that, contrary to representations in the mainstream media, there is increasing consensus over the science of the issue. Discussions of the type of policy instrument and the economic implications of regulating carbon dioxide emissions, however, continue to polarize opinion. This article concludes by exploring how these findings help us understand more recent political events around climate change.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Fisher, Dana R.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Waggle, Joseph</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-02T10:22:25Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
kops.flag.knbibliographytrue
kops.sourcefieldAmerican Behavioral Scientist. 2013, <b>57</b>(1), pp. 70-92. ISSN 0002-7642. eISSN 1552-3381. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0002764212463360deu
kops.sourcefield.plainAmerican Behavioral Scientist. 2013, 57(1), pp. 70-92. ISSN 0002-7642. eISSN 1552-3381. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0002764212463360deu
kops.sourcefield.plainAmerican Behavioral Scientist. 2013, 57(1), pp. 70-92. ISSN 0002-7642. eISSN 1552-3381. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0002764212463360eng
relation.isAuthorOfPublication8b96649c-f824-4e36-9976-621e88f77f79
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery8b96649c-f824-4e36-9976-621e88f77f79
source.bibliographicInfo.fromPage70eng
source.bibliographicInfo.issue1eng
source.bibliographicInfo.toPage92eng
source.bibliographicInfo.volume57eng
source.identifier.eissn1552-3381eng
source.identifier.issn0002-7642eng
source.periodicalTitleAmerican Behavioral Scientisteng
temp.internal.duplicates<p>Keine Dubletten gefunden. Letzte Überprüfung: 24.11.2014 13:36:09</p>deu

Dateien