Publikation: Where Does Political Polarization Come From? : Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
How do we understand political polarization within the U.S. climate change debate? This article unpacks the different components of the debate to determine the source of the political divide that is so noted in the mainstream media and academic literatures. Through analysis of the content of congressional hearings on the issue of climate change, we are able to explain political polarization of the issue more fully. In particular, our results show that, contrary to representations in the mainstream media, there is increasing consensus over the science of the issue. Discussions of the type of policy instrument and the economic implications of regulating carbon dioxide emissions, however, continue to polarize opinion. This article concludes by exploring how these findings help us understand more recent political events around climate change.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
FISHER, Dana R., Joseph WAGGLE, Philip LEIFELD, 2013. Where Does Political Polarization Come From? : Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate. In: American Behavioral Scientist. 2013, 57(1), pp. 70-92. ISSN 0002-7642. eISSN 1552-3381. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0002764212463360BibTex
@article{Fisher2013Where-29699, year={2013}, doi={10.1177/0002764212463360}, title={Where Does Political Polarization Come From? : Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate}, number={1}, volume={57}, issn={0002-7642}, journal={American Behavioral Scientist}, pages={70--92}, author={Fisher, Dana R. and Waggle, Joseph and Leifeld, Philip} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/29699"> <dc:creator>Leifeld, Philip</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:creator>Waggle, Joseph</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Fisher, Dana R.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Leifeld, Philip</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:title>Where Does Political Polarization Come From? : Locating Polarization Within the U.S. Climate Change Debate</dcterms:title> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/29699"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-02T10:22:25Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">How do we understand political polarization within the U.S. climate change debate? This article unpacks the different components of the debate to determine the source of the political divide that is so noted in the mainstream media and academic literatures. Through analysis of the content of congressional hearings on the issue of climate change, we are able to explain political polarization of the issue more fully. In particular, our results show that, contrary to representations in the mainstream media, there is increasing consensus over the science of the issue. Discussions of the type of policy instrument and the economic implications of regulating carbon dioxide emissions, however, continue to polarize opinion. This article concludes by exploring how these findings help us understand more recent political events around climate change.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Fisher, Dana R.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Waggle, Joseph</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-02-02T10:22:25Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>