Publikation: Global migration and political regime type : a democratic disadvantage
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2012
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
British Journal of Political Science. 2012, 42(04), pp. 825-854. ISSN 0007-1234. eISSN 1469-2112. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000051
Zusammenfassung
An indicator of globalization is the growing number of humans crossing national borders. In contrast to explanations for flows of goods and capital, migration research has concentrated on unilateral movements to rich democracies. This focus ignores the bilateral determinants of migration and stymies empirical and theoretical inquiry. The theoretical insights proposed here show how the regime type of both sending and receiving countries influences human migration. Specifically, democratic regimes accommodate fewer immigrants than autocracies and democracies enable emigration while autocracies prevent exit. The mechanisms for this divergence are a function of both micro-level motivations of migrants and institutional constraints on political leaders. Global bilateral migration data and a statistical method that captures the higher-order dependencies in network data are employed in this article.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
BREUNIG, Christian, Xun CAO, Adam LUEDTKE, 2012. Global migration and political regime type : a democratic disadvantage. In: British Journal of Political Science. 2012, 42(04), pp. 825-854. ISSN 0007-1234. eISSN 1469-2112. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S0007123412000051BibTex
@article{Breunig2012Globa-22656,
year={2012},
doi={10.1017/S0007123412000051},
title={Global migration and political regime type : a democratic disadvantage},
number={04},
volume={42},
issn={0007-1234},
journal={British Journal of Political Science},
pages={825--854},
author={Breunig, Christian and Cao, Xun and Luedtke, Adam}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/22656">
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-04-03T11:55:40Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:contributor>Luedtke, Adam</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/22656"/>
<dcterms:title>Global migration and political regime type : a democratic disadvantage</dcterms:title>
<dc:contributor>Breunig, Christian</dc:contributor>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:issued>2012</dcterms:issued>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-04-03T11:55:40Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Luedtke, Adam</dc:creator>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>British Journal of Political Science ; 42 (2012), 4. - S. 825-854</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dc:creator>Breunig, Christian</dc:creator>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
<dc:contributor>Cao, Xun</dc:contributor>
<dc:creator>Cao, Xun</dc:creator>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">An indicator of globalization is the growing number of humans crossing national borders. In contrast to explanations for flows of goods and capital, migration research has concentrated on unilateral movements to rich democracies. This focus ignores the bilateral determinants of migration and stymies empirical and theoretical inquiry. The theoretical insights proposed here show how the regime type of both sending and receiving countries influences human migration. Specifically, democratic regimes accommodate fewer immigrants than autocracies and democracies enable emigration while autocracies prevent exit. The mechanisms for this divergence are a function of both micro-level motivations of migrants and institutional constraints on political leaders. Global bilateral migration data and a statistical method that captures the higher-order dependencies in network data are employed in this article.</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
