Publikation:

Habitat suitability models based on opportunistic citizen science data : Evaluating forecasts from alternative methods versus an individual-based model

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Bradter_2-s4qxodzb5sa59.pdf
Bradter_2-s4qxodzb5sa59.pdfGröße: 722.93 KBDownloads: 91

Datum

2021

Autor:innen

Bradter, Ute
Ozgul, Arpat
Layton‐Matthews, Kate
Eggers, Jeannette
Singer, Alexander
Sandercock, Brett K.
Haverkamp, Paul J.
Snäll, Tord

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Diversity and Distributions. Wiley. 2021, 27(12), pp. 2397-2411. ISSN 1366-9516. eISSN 1472-4642. Available under: doi: 10.1111/ddi.13409

Zusammenfassung

Aim
To evaluate the utility of opportunistic data from citizen science programmes for forecasting species distributions against forecasts with a model of individual-based population dynamics.

Location
Sweden.

Methods
We evaluated whether alternative methods for building habitat suitability models (HSMs) based on opportunistic data from citizen science programmes produced forecasts that were consistent with forecasts from two benchmark models: (1) a HSM based on data from systematic monitoring and (2) an individual-based model for spatially explicit population dynamics based on empirical demographic and movement data. We forecasted population numbers and habitat suitability for three realistic, future forest landscapes for a forest bird, the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus). We ranked simulated forest landscapes with respect to their benefits to Siberian jays for each modelling method and compared the agreement of the rankings among methods.

Results
Forecasts based on our two benchmark models were consistent with each other and with expectations based on the species’ ecology. Forecasts from logistic regression models based on opportunistic data were consistent with the benchmark models if species detections were combined with high-quality inferred absences derived via retrospective interviews with experienced “super-reporters.” In contrast, forecasts with three other widely used methods were inconsistent with the benchmark models, sometimes with misleading rankings of future scenarios.

Main conclusions
Our critical evaluation of alternative HSMs against a spatially explicit IBM demonstrates that information on species absences critically improves forecasts of species distributions using opportunistic data from citizen science programmes. Moreover, high-quality information on species absences can be retrospectively inferred from surveys of the consistency of reporting of individual species and the identification skills of participating reporters. We recommend that citizen science projects incorporate procedures to evaluate reporting behaviour. Inferred absences may be especially useful for improving forecasts for species and regions poorly covered by systematic monitoring schemes.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
570 Biowissenschaften, Biologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690BRADTER, Ute, Arpat OZGUL, Michael GRIESSER, Kate LAYTON‐MATTHEWS, Jeannette EGGERS, Alexander SINGER, Brett K. SANDERCOCK, Paul J. HAVERKAMP, Tord SNÄLL, 2021. Habitat suitability models based on opportunistic citizen science data : Evaluating forecasts from alternative methods versus an individual-based model. In: Diversity and Distributions. Wiley. 2021, 27(12), pp. 2397-2411. ISSN 1366-9516. eISSN 1472-4642. Available under: doi: 10.1111/ddi.13409
BibTex
@article{Bradter2021-12Habit-55152,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1111/ddi.13409},
  title={Habitat suitability models based on opportunistic citizen science data : Evaluating forecasts from alternative methods versus an individual-based model},
  number={12},
  volume={27},
  issn={1366-9516},
  journal={Diversity and Distributions},
  pages={2397--2411},
  author={Bradter, Ute and Ozgul, Arpat and Griesser, Michael and Layton‐Matthews, Kate and Eggers, Jeannette and Singer, Alexander and Sandercock, Brett K. and Haverkamp, Paul J. and Snäll, Tord}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55152">
    <dcterms:issued>2021-12</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Eggers, Jeannette</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Griesser, Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Bradter, Ute</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Eggers, Jeannette</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Sandercock, Brett K.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Singer, Alexander</dc:creator>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55152/1/Bradter_2-s4qxodzb5sa59.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Griesser, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Aim&lt;br /&gt;To evaluate the utility of opportunistic data from citizen science programmes for forecasting species distributions against forecasts with a model of individual-based population dynamics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Location&lt;br /&gt;Sweden.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Methods&lt;br /&gt;We evaluated whether alternative methods for building habitat suitability models (HSMs) based on opportunistic data from citizen science programmes produced forecasts that were consistent with forecasts from two benchmark models: (1) a HSM based on data from systematic monitoring and (2) an individual-based model for spatially explicit population dynamics based on empirical demographic and movement data. We forecasted population numbers and habitat suitability for three realistic, future forest landscapes for a forest bird, the Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus). We ranked simulated forest landscapes with respect to their benefits to Siberian jays for each modelling method and compared the agreement of the rankings among methods.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results&lt;br /&gt;Forecasts based on our two benchmark models were consistent with each other and with expectations based on the species’ ecology. Forecasts from logistic regression models based on opportunistic data were consistent with the benchmark models if species detections were combined with high-quality inferred absences derived via retrospective interviews with experienced “super-reporters.” In contrast, forecasts with three other widely used methods were inconsistent with the benchmark models, sometimes with misleading rankings of future scenarios.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Main conclusions&lt;br /&gt;Our critical evaluation of alternative HSMs against a spatially explicit IBM demonstrates that information on species absences critically improves forecasts of species distributions using opportunistic data from citizen science programmes. Moreover, high-quality information on species absences can be retrospectively inferred from surveys of the consistency of reporting of individual species and the identification skills of participating reporters. We recommend that citizen science projects incorporate procedures to evaluate reporting behaviour. Inferred absences may be especially useful for improving forecasts for species and regions poorly covered by systematic monitoring schemes.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Bradter, Ute</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Snäll, Tord</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43615"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-05T10:54:06Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Ozgul, Arpat</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55152"/>
    <dc:creator>Layton‐Matthews, Kate</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43615"/>
    <dc:contributor>Layton‐Matthews, Kate</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-10-05T10:54:06Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55152/1/Bradter_2-s4qxodzb5sa59.pdf"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:title>Habitat suitability models based on opportunistic citizen science data : Evaluating forecasts from alternative methods versus an individual-based model</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Ozgul, Arpat</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Singer, Alexander</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Haverkamp, Paul J.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Snäll, Tord</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/28"/>
    <dc:creator>Haverkamp, Paul J.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Sandercock, Brett K.</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen