Publikation:

Don’t blame the teacher? : The need to account for classroom characteristics in evaluations of teaching quality

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Fauth, Benjamin
Wagner, Wolfgang
Göllner, Richard
Roloff, Janina
Lüdtke, Oliver
Polikoff, Morgan S.
Klusmann, Uta
Trautwein, Ulrich

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Journal of Educational Psychology. American Psychological Association. 2020, 112(6), pp. 1284-1302. ISSN 0022-0663. eISSN 1939-2176. Available under: doi: 10.1037/edu0000416

Zusammenfassung

Previous research provides evidence that ratings from students and external observers can deliver reliable and valid measures of teaching quality. However, there is still a lack of research on how stable these measures are across time and classes, which is particularly important when they are used for evaluations. We addressed this issue in 3 different studies from Germany. Study 1 examined stability over time using a longitudinal sample of 174 teachers and 106 classes. The results show that student ratings of teaching quality are relatively stable when the same class rates the same teacher in 2 subsequent school years. However, we also found teacher-independent stabilities, which occurred when the same students rated different teachers. Study 2 examined stabilities in student ratings across classes. In this study, each teacher (N = 95) was evaluated by 2 different classes (N = 190). The results of a 3-level model reveal rather low stabilities across classes within teachers. Study 3 drew on a unique dataset in which 1 single teacher taught the same content to 30 different classes of the same grade level. Teaching quality as rated by students and external observers varied considerably between these classes. Differences in teaching quality were related to student learning, and the motivation of students in a class was a significant predictor of differences in teaching quality. In summary, the results of these studies show that both researchers and policymakers should be cautious when interpreting measures of teaching quality as indicators of teacher quality.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
370 Erziehung, Schul- und Bildungswesen

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690FAUTH, Benjamin, Wolfgang WAGNER, Christiane BERTRAM, Richard GÖLLNER, Janina ROLOFF, Oliver LÜDTKE, Morgan S. POLIKOFF, Uta KLUSMANN, Ulrich TRAUTWEIN, 2020. Don’t blame the teacher? : The need to account for classroom characteristics in evaluations of teaching quality. In: Journal of Educational Psychology. American Psychological Association. 2020, 112(6), pp. 1284-1302. ISSN 0022-0663. eISSN 1939-2176. Available under: doi: 10.1037/edu0000416
BibTex
@article{Fauth2020-08blame-47628,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1037/edu0000416},
  title={Don’t blame the teacher? : The need to account for classroom characteristics in evaluations of teaching quality},
  number={6},
  volume={112},
  issn={0022-0663},
  journal={Journal of Educational Psychology},
  pages={1284--1302},
  author={Fauth, Benjamin and Wagner, Wolfgang and Bertram, Christiane and Göllner, Richard and Roloff, Janina and Lüdtke, Oliver and Polikoff, Morgan S. and Klusmann, Uta and Trautwein, Ulrich}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47628">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Previous research provides evidence that ratings from students and external observers can deliver reliable and valid measures of teaching quality. However, there is still a lack of research on how stable these measures are across time and classes, which is particularly important when they are used for evaluations. We addressed this issue in 3 different studies from Germany. Study 1 examined stability over time using a longitudinal sample of 174 teachers and 106 classes. The results show that student ratings of teaching quality are relatively stable when the same class rates the same teacher in 2 subsequent school years. However, we also found teacher-independent stabilities, which occurred when the same students rated different teachers. Study 2 examined stabilities in student ratings across classes. In this study, each teacher (N = 95) was evaluated by 2 different classes (N = 190). The results of a 3-level model reveal rather low stabilities across classes within teachers. Study 3 drew on a unique dataset in which 1 single teacher taught the same content to 30 different classes of the same grade level. Teaching quality as rated by students and external observers varied considerably between these classes. Differences in teaching quality were related to student learning, and the motivation of students in a class was a significant predictor of differences in teaching quality. In summary, the results of these studies show that both researchers and policymakers should be cautious when interpreting measures of teaching quality as indicators of teacher quality.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/>
    <dc:creator>Klusmann, Uta</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Göllner, Richard</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Lüdtke, Oliver</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
    <dc:creator>Fauth, Benjamin</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Trautwein, Ulrich</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Klusmann, Uta</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Polikoff, Morgan S.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Don’t blame the teacher? : The need to account for classroom characteristics in evaluations of teaching quality</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Lüdtke, Oliver</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Trautwein, Ulrich</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Bertram, Christiane</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47628"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/>
    <dc:contributor>Fauth, Benjamin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Wagner, Wolfgang</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-08</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:creator>Polikoff, Morgan S.</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Göllner, Richard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-11-26T12:16:44Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Roloff, Janina</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Bertram, Christiane</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Wagner, Wolfgang</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Roloff, Janina</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-11-26T12:16:44Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen