Publikation: Do policy clashes between the judiciary and the executive affect public opinion? : Insights from New Delhi’s odd–even rule against air pollution
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Policy processes are affected by how policymakers assess public support for a policy. But is public support for a given policy itself affected by characteristics of the policy process, such as cooperation or confrontation amongst policy actors? Specifically, if different branches of government hold conflicting positions on a given policy, do clashes affect public support for the policy? To address this question, we exploit an unexpected clash amongst the executive and judiciary in New Delhi, between survey waves, over exemptions for women in the context of the odd–even rule, a policy intervention to reduce air pollution from transportation. We find that public support for the contested policy was not undermined by the executive–judiciary clash. However, the clash polarised public opinion by gender, based upon the policy exemptions. Our findings shed new light on the broader question of how conflicts amongst different parts of government influence mass public policy preferences.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BEISER-MCGRATH, Liam F., Thomas BERNAUER, Aseem PRAKASH, 2022. Do policy clashes between the judiciary and the executive affect public opinion? : Insights from New Delhi’s odd–even rule against air pollution. In: Journal of Public Policy. Cambridge University Press. 2022, 42(1), pp. 185-200. ISSN 0143-814X. eISSN 1469-7815. Available under: doi: 10.1017/S0143814X2100012XBibTex
@article{BeiserMcGrath2022-03polic-55699, year={2022}, doi={10.1017/S0143814X2100012X}, title={Do policy clashes between the judiciary and the executive affect public opinion? : Insights from New Delhi’s odd–even rule against air pollution}, number={1}, volume={42}, issn={0143-814X}, journal={Journal of Public Policy}, pages={185--200}, author={Beiser-McGrath, Liam F. and Bernauer, Thomas and Prakash, Aseem} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/55699"> <dc:creator>Prakash, Aseem</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55699/1/Beiser-McGrath_2-r9ljbiefuxxd5.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Bernauer, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Prakash, Aseem</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-29T14:44:24Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"/> <dc:creator>Beiser-McGrath, Liam F.</dc:creator> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dcterms:issued>2022-03</dcterms:issued> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Policy processes are affected by how policymakers assess public support for a policy. But is public support for a given policy itself affected by characteristics of the policy process, such as cooperation or confrontation amongst policy actors? Specifically, if different branches of government hold conflicting positions on a given policy, do clashes affect public support for the policy? To address this question, we exploit an unexpected clash amongst the executive and judiciary in New Delhi, between survey waves, over exemptions for women in the context of the odd–even rule, a policy intervention to reduce air pollution from transportation. We find that public support for the contested policy was not undermined by the executive–judiciary clash. However, the clash polarised public opinion by gender, based upon the policy exemptions. Our findings shed new light on the broader question of how conflicts amongst different parts of government influence mass public policy preferences.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-11-29T14:44:24Z</dc:date> <dcterms:title>Do policy clashes between the judiciary and the executive affect public opinion? : Insights from New Delhi’s odd–even rule against air pollution</dcterms:title> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International</dc:rights> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/55699"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/55699/1/Beiser-McGrath_2-r9ljbiefuxxd5.pdf"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:creator>Bernauer, Thomas</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Beiser-McGrath, Liam F.</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>