Publikation:

Wollen wir uns irritieren lassen? : Für eine Sensibilisierung der Methoden qualitativer Forschung zur interkulturellen Kommunikation durch postkoloniale Theorie

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2009

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Qualitative Research on Intercultural Communication. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. 2009, 10(1), 42. ISSN 1438-5627. Available under: doi: 10.17169/fqs-10.1.1232

Zusammenfassung

In academic research on intercultural communication, imperfect translation of culturally shaped articulation is usually conceived of as a problem—be it in scientific settings or in everyday-life. The success of intercultural communication thus becomes the desired goal. Against the background of post-colonial theory, the present contribution rests on the assumption that communicative irritation in the framework of qualitative research can be an expression of the research subjects' resistive potential to negotiate their identities beyond the limits of discursive attributes. The author holds that this potential can be transformed into a fruitful irritation of the scientific discourse itself. Based on these arguments, qualitative research is required to allow for the resistive potential of research subjects throughout the different stages of the research process. With reference to selected qualitative works, some strategies will be sketched to employ post-colonial ideas to qualitative research.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie

Schlagwörter

creative intervention, identity, representation, post-colonial theory

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690PLODER, Andrea, 2009. Wollen wir uns irritieren lassen? : Für eine Sensibilisierung der Methoden qualitativer Forschung zur interkulturellen Kommunikation durch postkoloniale Theorie. In: Qualitative Research on Intercultural Communication. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung. 2009, 10(1), 42. ISSN 1438-5627. Available under: doi: 10.17169/fqs-10.1.1232
BibTex
@article{Ploder2009Wolle-54331,
  year={2009},
  doi={10.17169/fqs-10.1.1232},
  title={Wollen wir uns irritieren lassen? : Für eine Sensibilisierung der Methoden qualitativer Forschung zur interkulturellen Kommunikation durch postkoloniale Theorie},
  number={1},
  volume={10},
  issn={1438-5627},
  journal={Qualitative Research on Intercultural Communication},
  author={Ploder, Andrea},
  note={Article Number: 42}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/54331">
    <dc:language>deu</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-07-16T13:15:19Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Wollen wir uns irritieren lassen? : Für eine Sensibilisierung der Methoden qualitativer Forschung zur interkulturellen Kommunikation durch postkoloniale Theorie</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/54331"/>
    <dc:creator>Ploder, Andrea</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Ploder, Andrea</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-07-16T13:15:19Z</dcterms:available>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">In academic research on intercultural communication, imperfect translation of culturally shaped articulation is usually conceived of as a problem—be it in scientific settings or in everyday-life. The success of intercultural communication thus becomes the desired goal. Against the background of post-colonial theory, the present contribution rests on the assumption that communicative irritation in the framework of qualitative research can be an expression of the research subjects' resistive potential to negotiate their identities beyond the limits of discursive attributes. The author holds that this potential can be transformed into a fruitful irritation of the scientific discourse itself. Based on these arguments, qualitative research is required to allow for the resistive potential of research subjects throughout the different stages of the research process. With reference to selected qualitative works, some strategies will be sketched to employ post-colonial ideas to qualitative research.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen