Publikation: Two routes to aesthetic preference, one route to aesthetic inference
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Aesthetic preferences vary strongly between people. Yet, it can be essential to infer what other people aesthetically prefer. Therefore, we investigated lay people’s ability to infer aesthetic preferences and the involved processes. Because aesthetic preference depends on affective as well as cognitive processes, we asked 40 participants to rate 24 artworks on the dimensions Positive Attraction, Cognitive Stimulation, and Emotionality. Additionally, participants had to infer other people’s judgments concerning the same stimuli and dimensions. In the self-assessment, Positive Attraction correlated strongly with Emotionality as well as with Cognitive Stimulation, whereas in the other-assessment, Positive Attraction correlated only with Emotionality. An interassessment correlation revealed that about half of the participants produced a significant medium to high correlation between their other assessments and the mean others′ self-assessment, depending on the respective dimension. Thus, our results indicate that many individuals are able to infer aesthetic preferences, and that preferences for artworks are inferred primarily via affective stimulus appraisal.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
MILLER, Chantal A., Ronald HÜBNER, 2020. Two routes to aesthetic preference, one route to aesthetic inference. In: Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. American Psychological Association. 2020, 14(2), pp. 237-249. ISSN 1931-3896. eISSN 1931-390X. Available under: doi: 10.1037/aca0000241BibTex
@article{Miller2020-05route-45326,
year={2020},
doi={10.1037/aca0000241},
title={Two routes to aesthetic preference, one route to aesthetic inference},
number={2},
volume={14},
issn={1931-3896},
journal={Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts},
pages={237--249},
author={Miller, Chantal A. and Hübner, Ronald}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45326">
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:creator>Hübner, Ronald</dc:creator>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/45326"/>
<dc:contributor>Hübner, Ronald</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-03-06T09:55:07Z</dcterms:available>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:title>Two routes to aesthetic preference, one route to aesthetic inference</dcterms:title>
<dc:creator>Miller, Chantal A.</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-03-06T09:55:07Z</dc:date>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:contributor>Miller, Chantal A.</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:issued>2020-05</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Aesthetic preferences vary strongly between people. Yet, it can be essential to infer what other people aesthetically prefer. Therefore, we investigated lay people’s ability to infer aesthetic preferences and the involved processes. Because aesthetic preference depends on affective as well as cognitive processes, we asked 40 participants to rate 24 artworks on the dimensions Positive Attraction, Cognitive Stimulation, and Emotionality. Additionally, participants had to infer other people’s judgments concerning the same stimuli and dimensions. In the self-assessment, Positive Attraction correlated strongly with Emotionality as well as with Cognitive Stimulation, whereas in the other-assessment, Positive Attraction correlated only with Emotionality. An interassessment correlation revealed that about half of the participants produced a significant medium to high correlation between their other assessments and the mean others′ self-assessment, depending on the respective dimension. Thus, our results indicate that many individuals are able to infer aesthetic preferences, and that preferences for artworks are inferred primarily via affective stimulus appraisal.</dcterms:abstract>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
