Publikation: Modal Superlatives and 3-Place vs. 2-Place -est
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Superlative sentences with modal modifiers like possible give rise to the so-called 'modal superlative reading' (Larson 2000, Schwarz 2005). The present paper uses this reading to investigate an open issue in degree constructions: whereas two different lexical entries have been argued to exist for the comparative morpheme -er (3-place and 2-place), it is not clear whether two entries are needed for the superlative morpheme -est. The paper argues that, with 3-place –est, otherwise unmotivated syntactic material would to have to be postulated and that, even with this material, not all modal superlative examples would be assigned correct truth conditions. In contrast, 2-place -est can generate the modal superlative reading in all the cases, as shown in Romero (to appear, under review). Modal superlative sentences, thus, provide evidence that 2-place –est is needed in the grammar.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
ROMERO, Maribel, 2011. Modal Superlatives and 3-Place vs. 2-Place -est. 6th International Symposium of Cognition, Logic and Communication : Formal Semantics and Pragmatics: Discourse, Context, and Models. Riga, 19. Nov. 2010 - 21. Nov. 2010. In: MICHAEL GLANZBERG ..., , ed.. Formal Semantics and Pragmatics : Discourse, Context, and Models ; Proceedings of the Symposium for Cognition, Logic and Communication. Manhattan, KS: New Prairie Press, 2011, pp. 1-39. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication. 6BibTex
@inproceedings{Romero2011Modal-30295, year={2011}, title={Modal Superlatives and 3-Place vs. 2-Place -est}, url={http://ling.uni-konstanz.de/pages/home/romero/papers/Romero-Riga-preprint.pdf}, number={6}, publisher={New Prairie Press}, address={Manhattan, KS}, series={Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication}, booktitle={Formal Semantics and Pragmatics : Discourse, Context, and Models ; Proceedings of the Symposium for Cognition, Logic and Communication}, pages={1--39}, editor={Michael Glanzberg ...}, author={Romero, Maribel} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30295"> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-16T12:26:43Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Superlative sentences with modal modifiers like possible give rise to the so-called 'modal superlative reading' (Larson 2000, Schwarz 2005). The present paper uses this reading to investigate an open issue in degree constructions: whereas two different lexical entries have been argued to exist for the comparative morpheme -er (3-place and 2-place), it is not clear whether two entries are needed for the superlative morpheme -est. The paper argues that, with 3-place –est, otherwise unmotivated syntactic material would to have to be postulated and that, even with this material, not all modal superlative examples would be assigned correct truth conditions. In contrast, 2-place -est can generate the modal superlative reading in all the cases, as shown in Romero (to appear, under review). Modal superlative sentences, thus, provide evidence that 2-place –est is needed in the grammar.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>Modal Superlatives and 3-Place vs. 2-Place -est</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Romero, Maribel</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Romero, Maribel</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/30295"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-03-16T12:26:43Z</dc:date> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>