Why do junctures become critical? : Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective

Rinscheid, Adrian; Eberlein, Burkard; Emmenegger, Patrick; Schneider, Volker

Why do junctures become critical? : Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2020

Autor:innen

Rinscheid, Adrian

Eberlein, Burkard

Emmenegger, Patrick

Schneider, Volker

DOI (zitierfähiger Link)

https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12238

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Regulation & Governance. Wiley. 2020, 14(4), pp. 653-673. ISSN 1748-5983. eISSN 1748-5991. Available under: doi: 10.1111/rego.12238

Zusammenfassung

Why do junctures become critical in some cases but not in others? Building on the critical juncture framework and perspectives on the formation and diffusion of beliefs, we develop a theoretically parsimonious and empirically traceable account of divergence in institutional outcomes. By illuminating the role of agency and joint belief shifts we further open the “black box” of critical junctures. In particular, we develop the argument that the role agents play is conditioned by conflict lines that structure an institutional field before a juncture sets in. Empirically, we trace political discourses around the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident in Canada, Germany, and Japan using discourse network analysis. Through comparative investigation, we empirically show that discursive interactions during potential critical junctures indicate institutional outcomes that are shaped by causally relevant historical legacies.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Zitieren

ISO 690

RINSCHEID, Adrian, Burkard EBERLEIN, Patrick EMMENEGGER, Volker SCHNEIDER, 2020. Why do junctures become critical? : Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective. In: Regulation & Governance. Wiley. 2020, 14(4), pp. 653-673. ISSN 1748-5983. eISSN 1748-5991. Available under: doi: 10.1111/rego.12238

BibTex

@article{Rinscheid2020-10junct-51443,
  year={2020},
  doi={10.1111/rego.12238},
  title={Why do junctures become critical? : Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective},
  number={4},
  volume={14},
  issn={1748-5983},
  journal={Regulation & Governance},
  pages={653--673},
  author={Rinscheid, Adrian and Eberlein, Burkard and Emmenegger, Patrick and Schneider, Volker}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/51443">
    <dc:creator>Eberlein, Burkard</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Schneider, Volker</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2020-10</dcterms:issued>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Rinscheid, Adrian</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-22T09:21:39Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Emmenegger, Patrick</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Eberlein, Burkard</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Rinscheid, Adrian</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Emmenegger, Patrick</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Why do junctures become critical in some cases but not in others? Building on the critical juncture framework and perspectives on the formation and diffusion of beliefs, we develop a theoretically parsimonious and empirically traceable account of divergence in institutional outcomes. By illuminating the role of agency and joint belief shifts we further open the “black box” of critical junctures. In particular, we develop the argument that the role agents play is conditioned by conflict lines that structure an institutional field before a juncture sets in. Empirically, we trace political discourses around the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident in Canada, Germany, and Japan using discourse network analysis. Through comparative investigation, we empirically show that discursive interactions during potential critical junctures indicate institutional outcomes that are shaped by causally relevant historical legacies.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Schneider, Volker</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51443"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-22T09:21:39Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>Why do junctures become critical? : Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective</dcterms:title>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja

Begutachtet

Ja