Publikation: Why do junctures become critical? : Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Why do junctures become critical in some cases but not in others? Building on the critical juncture framework and perspectives on the formation and diffusion of beliefs, we develop a theoretically parsimonious and empirically traceable account of divergence in institutional outcomes. By illuminating the role of agency and joint belief shifts we further open the “black box” of critical junctures. In particular, we develop the argument that the role agents play is conditioned by conflict lines that structure an institutional field before a juncture sets in. Empirically, we trace political discourses around the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident in Canada, Germany, and Japan using discourse network analysis. Through comparative investigation, we empirically show that discursive interactions during potential critical junctures indicate institutional outcomes that are shaped by causally relevant historical legacies.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
RINSCHEID, Adrian, Burkard EBERLEIN, Patrick EMMENEGGER, Volker SCHNEIDER, 2020. Why do junctures become critical? : Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective. In: Regulation & Governance. Wiley. 2020, 14(4), pp. 653-673. ISSN 1748-5983. eISSN 1748-5991. Available under: doi: 10.1111/rego.12238BibTex
@article{Rinscheid2020-10junct-51443, year={2020}, doi={10.1111/rego.12238}, title={Why do junctures become critical? : Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective}, number={4}, volume={14}, issn={1748-5983}, journal={Regulation & Governance}, pages={653--673}, author={Rinscheid, Adrian and Eberlein, Burkard and Emmenegger, Patrick and Schneider, Volker} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/51443"> <dc:creator>Eberlein, Burkard</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Schneider, Volker</dc:contributor> <dcterms:issued>2020-10</dcterms:issued> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:creator>Rinscheid, Adrian</dc:creator> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-22T09:21:39Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Emmenegger, Patrick</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Eberlein, Burkard</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Rinscheid, Adrian</dc:contributor> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Emmenegger, Patrick</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Why do junctures become critical in some cases but not in others? Building on the critical juncture framework and perspectives on the formation and diffusion of beliefs, we develop a theoretically parsimonious and empirically traceable account of divergence in institutional outcomes. By illuminating the role of agency and joint belief shifts we further open the “black box” of critical junctures. In particular, we develop the argument that the role agents play is conditioned by conflict lines that structure an institutional field before a juncture sets in. Empirically, we trace political discourses around the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident in Canada, Germany, and Japan using discourse network analysis. Through comparative investigation, we empirically show that discursive interactions during potential critical junctures indicate institutional outcomes that are shaped by causally relevant historical legacies.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Schneider, Volker</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/51443"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2020-10-22T09:21:39Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:title>Why do junctures become critical? : Political discourse, agency, and joint belief shifts in comparative perspective</dcterms:title> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>