Publikation:

Evaluation and update of the expert consensus guidelines for the assessment of the cortisol awakening response (CAR)

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Stalder_2-nwrugkvwqq4i0.pdf
Stalder_2-nwrugkvwqq4i0.pdfGröße: 651.2 KBDownloads: 10

Datum

2022

Autor:innen

Stalder, Tobias
Lupien, Sonia J.
Kudielka, Brigitte M.
Adam, Emma K.
Wüst, Stefan
Dockray, Samantha
Smyth, Nina
Evans, Phil
Kirschbaum, Clemens
et al.

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Psychoneuroendocrinology. Elsevier. 2022, 146, 105946. ISSN 0306-4530. eISSN 1873-3360. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105946

Zusammenfassung

The cortisol awakening response (CAR) is frequently assessed in psychobiological (stress) research. Obtaining reliable CAR data, however, requires careful attention to methodological detail. To promote best practice, expert consensus guidelines on the assessment of the CAR were published (Stalder et al., 2016, PNEC). However, it is unclear whether these highly cited guidelines have resulted in actual methodological improvements. To explore this, the PNEC editorial board invited the present authors to conduct a critical evaluation and update of current CAR methodology, which is reported here. (i) A quantitative evaluation of methodological quality of CAR research published in PNEC before and after the guidelines (2013-2015 vs. 2018-2020) was conducted. Disappointingly, results reveal little improvement in the implementation of central recommendations (especially objective time verification) in recent research. (ii) To enable an update of guidelines, evidence on recent developments in CAR assessment is reviewed, which mostly confirms the accuracy of the majority of the original guidelines. Moreover, recent technological advances, particularly regarding methods for the verification of awakening and sampling times, have emerged and may help to reduce costs in future research. (iii) To aid researchers and increase accessibility, an updated and streamlined version of the CAR consensus guidelines is presented. (iv) Finally, the response of the PNEC editorial board to the present results is described: potential authors of future CAR research to be published in PNEC will be required to submit a methodological checklist (based on the current guidelines) alongside their article. This will increase transparency and enable reviewers to readily assess the quality of the respective CAR data. Combined, it is hoped that these steps will assist researchers and reviewers in assuring higher quality CAR assessments in future research, thus yielding more reliable and reproducible results and helping to further advance this field of study.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

CAR, measurement, saliva, adherence, guidelines, update

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690STALDER, Tobias, Sonia J. LUPIEN, Brigitte M. KUDIELKA, Emma K. ADAM, Jens C. PRUESSNER, Stefan WÜST, Samantha DOCKRAY, Nina SMYTH, Phil EVANS, Clemens KIRSCHBAUM, 2022. Evaluation and update of the expert consensus guidelines for the assessment of the cortisol awakening response (CAR). In: Psychoneuroendocrinology. Elsevier. 2022, 146, 105946. ISSN 0306-4530. eISSN 1873-3360. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105946
BibTex
@article{Stalder2022-09-27Evalu-58739,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105946},
  title={Evaluation and update of the expert consensus guidelines for the assessment of the cortisol awakening response (CAR)},
  volume={146},
  issn={0306-4530},
  journal={Psychoneuroendocrinology},
  author={Stalder, Tobias and Lupien, Sonia J. and Kudielka, Brigitte M. and Adam, Emma K. and Pruessner, Jens C. and Wüst, Stefan and Dockray, Samantha and Smyth, Nina and Evans, Phil and Kirschbaum, Clemens},
  note={Article Number: 105946}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/58739">
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The cortisol awakening response (CAR) is frequently assessed in psychobiological (stress) research. Obtaining reliable CAR data, however, requires careful attention to methodological detail. To promote best practice, expert consensus guidelines on the assessment of the CAR were published (Stalder et al., 2016, PNEC). However, it is unclear whether these highly cited guidelines have resulted in actual methodological improvements. To explore this, the PNEC editorial board invited the present authors to conduct a critical evaluation and update of current CAR methodology, which is reported here. (i) A quantitative evaluation of methodological quality of CAR research published in PNEC before and after the guidelines (2013-2015 vs. 2018-2020) was conducted. Disappointingly, results reveal little improvement in the implementation of central recommendations (especially objective time verification) in recent research. (ii) To enable an update of guidelines, evidence on recent developments in CAR assessment is reviewed, which mostly confirms the accuracy of the majority of the original guidelines. Moreover, recent technological advances, particularly regarding methods for the verification of awakening and sampling times, have emerged and may help to reduce costs in future research. (iii) To aid researchers and increase accessibility, an updated and streamlined version of the CAR consensus guidelines is presented. (iv) Finally, the response of the PNEC editorial board to the present results is described: potential authors of future CAR research to be published in PNEC will be required to submit a methodological checklist (based on the current guidelines) alongside their article. This will increase transparency and enable reviewers to readily assess the quality of the respective CAR data. Combined, it is hoped that these steps will assist researchers and reviewers in assuring higher quality CAR assessments in future research, thus yielding more reliable and reproducible results and helping to further advance this field of study.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Kirschbaum, Clemens</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-10-06T08:42:22Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:contributor>Adam, Emma K.</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Wüst, Stefan</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:title>Evaluation and update of the expert consensus guidelines for the assessment of the cortisol awakening response (CAR)</dcterms:title>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/58739"/>
    <dc:contributor>Wüst, Stefan</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2022-09-27</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Kudielka, Brigitte M.</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Dockray, Samantha</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Smyth, Nina</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/58739/1/Stalder_2-nwrugkvwqq4i0.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Lupien, Sonia J.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Kirschbaum, Clemens</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-10-06T08:42:22Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/58739/1/Stalder_2-nwrugkvwqq4i0.pdf"/>
    <dc:creator>Kudielka, Brigitte M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Adam, Emma K.</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Dockray, Samantha</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Evans, Phil</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Stalder, Tobias</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Evans, Phil</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Lupien, Sonia J.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Stalder, Tobias</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Pruessner, Jens C.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Smyth, Nina</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen