Publikation:

Beyond MaxElide : an investigation of Ā-movement from Elided Phrases

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2019

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00317
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Sammlungen

Zukunftskolleg: Publikationen
Linguistik: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Linguistic Inquiry. 2019, 50(3), pp. 571-607. ISSN 0024-3892. eISSN 1530-9150. Available under: doi: 10.1162/ling_a_00317

Zusammenfassung

Using Takahashi & Fox (2005) as an exemplar, this paper argues that analyses of English ellipsis that make recourse to a MaxElide constraint (first introduced by Merchant 2008) are misguided, and that one must look beyond MaxElide to explain the distribution of acceptability in the ‘rebinding’ elliptical constructions that MaxElide was originally invoked to explain. A novel analysis is outlined which attributes the unacceptability observed in the rebinding dataset to an inability to satisfy a more restrictive, reflexive version of Takahashi & Fox’s Parallelism condition on ellipsis recoverability. More broadly, the success of this analysis supports the notion that clausal and non-clausal ellipsis are governed by distinct recoverability conditions. This paper therefore provides support for a non-unitary approach to the semantic licensing of ellipsis.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
400 Sprachwissenschaft, Linguistik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690GRIFFITHS, James, 2019. Beyond MaxElide : an investigation of Ā-movement from Elided Phrases. In: Linguistic Inquiry. 2019, 50(3), pp. 571-607. ISSN 0024-3892. eISSN 1530-9150. Available under: doi: 10.1162/ling_a_00317
BibTex
@article{Griffiths2019-06Beyon-44927,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1162/ling_a_00317},
  title={Beyond MaxElide : an investigation of Ā-movement from Elided Phrases},
  number={3},
  volume={50},
  issn={0024-3892},
  journal={Linguistic Inquiry},
  pages={571--607},
  author={Griffiths, James}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44927">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/44927"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-06</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Griffiths, James</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Using Takahashi &amp; Fox (2005) as an exemplar, this paper argues that analyses of English ellipsis that make recourse to a MaxElide constraint (first introduced by Merchant 2008) are misguided, and that one must look beyond MaxElide to explain the distribution of acceptability in the ‘rebinding’ elliptical constructions that MaxElide was originally invoked to explain. A novel analysis is outlined which attributes the unacceptability observed in the rebinding dataset to an inability to satisfy a more restrictive, reflexive version of Takahashi &amp; Fox’s Parallelism condition on ellipsis recoverability. More broadly, the success of this analysis supports the notion that clausal and non-clausal ellipsis are governed by distinct recoverability conditions. This paper therefore provides support for a non-unitary approach to the semantic licensing of ellipsis.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-02-07T16:55:59Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-02-07T16:55:59Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/>
    <dcterms:title>Beyond MaxElide : an investigation of Ā-movement from Elided Phrases</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/>
    <dc:contributor>Griffiths, James</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Nein
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen