Publikation: The connection between prosodic realisations of German Wh-questions and their pragmatic embeddings
Dateien
Datum
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
We hypothesise that a speaker using falling intonation on a Wh-question, which corresponds to the default contour in German, indicates to their addressee the possibility to respond with a null-answer like “nobody” or “nothing”. With a rising intonation, on the other hand, the speaker is supposed to explicitly deny the possibility of such an answer due to prior knowledge that the existential implication of the question is true. We ran two perception experiments, in which participants were exposed to two types of contexts, either allowing or disallowing the null-answer, followed by either a rising or a falling Wh-question. Results show that participants did not integrate context and contour. Nevertheless, both variables influenced the participants’ acceptability ratings. Results are discussed in terms of semantics and pragmatics of questions.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
HOFENBITZER, Justin, Bettina BRAUN, Maribel ROMERO, 2021. The connection between prosodic realisations of German Wh-questions and their pragmatic embeddings. 1st International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI). Sonderborg, Denmark, 6. Dez. 2021 - 9. Dez. 2021. In: NIEBUHR, Oliver, ed.. Proceedings of the first International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI). Baixas, France: ISCA, 2021, pp. 239-243. Available under: doi: 10.21437/TAI.2021-49BibTex
@inproceedings{Hofenbitzer2021conne-59344, year={2021}, doi={10.21437/TAI.2021-49}, title={The connection between prosodic realisations of German Wh-questions and their pragmatic embeddings}, publisher={ISCA}, address={Baixas, France}, booktitle={Proceedings of the first International Conference on Tone and Intonation (TAI)}, pages={239--243}, editor={Niebuhr, Oliver}, author={Hofenbitzer, Justin and Braun, Bettina and Romero, Maribel} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/59344"> <dc:creator>Romero, Maribel</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-11-29T13:35:38Z</dc:date> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/59344/1/Hofenbitzer_2-na3x6xjgx0fu3.pdf"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/45"/> <dc:contributor>Braun, Bettina</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>The connection between prosodic realisations of German Wh-questions and their pragmatic embeddings</dcterms:title> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">We hypothesise that a speaker using falling intonation on a Wh-question, which corresponds to the default contour in German, indicates to their addressee the possibility to respond with a null-answer like “nobody” or “nothing”. With a rising intonation, on the other hand, the speaker is supposed to explicitly deny the possibility of such an answer due to prior knowledge that the existential implication of the question is true. We ran two perception experiments, in which participants were exposed to two types of contexts, either allowing or disallowing the null-answer, followed by either a rising or a falling Wh-question. Results show that participants did not integrate context and contour. Nevertheless, both variables influenced the participants’ acceptability ratings. Results are discussed in terms of semantics and pragmatics of questions.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/59344/1/Hofenbitzer_2-na3x6xjgx0fu3.pdf"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Romero, Maribel</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Hofenbitzer, Justin</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-11-29T13:35:38Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:creator>Hofenbitzer, Justin</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:creator>Braun, Bettina</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/59344"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>