Publikation: Attributional retraining and elaborative learning : Improving academic development through writing-based interventions
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Attributional retraining (AR) is a motivational intervention that consistently produces improved performance by encouraging controllable failure attributions. Research suggests that cognitively engaging AR methods are ideal for high-elaborating students, whereas affect-oriented techniques are better for low-elaborating students. College students' (N=749) elaborative learning was assessed in the first semester, after which students were assigned to one of three writing-based AR conditions (No AR, Cognitive AR, Affective AR). Academic performance (course grades, GPA), motivation, attributions, and emotions were assessed in the second semester. AR by elaboration (low/high) 3×2 ANCOVAs showed optimal results for high elaborators following cognitive AR, and for low elaborators following affective AR. Performance improvements for the former were mediated by improved cognitions (expectations), and for the latter were mediated by increased positive affect.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
HALL, Nathan C., Raymond P. PERRY, Thomas GÖTZ, Joelle C. RUTHIG, Robert H. STUPNISKY, Nancy E. NEWALL, 2007. Attributional retraining and elaborative learning : Improving academic development through writing-based interventions. In: Elsevier Learning and Individual Differences. 2007, 17(3), pp. 280-290. Available under: doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.04.002BibTex
@article{Hall2007Attri-498, year={2007}, doi={10.1016/j.lindif.2007.04.002}, title={Attributional retraining and elaborative learning : Improving academic development through writing-based interventions}, number={3}, volume={17}, journal={Elsevier Learning and Individual Differences}, pages={280--290}, author={Hall, Nathan C. and Perry, Raymond P. and Götz, Thomas and Ruthig, Joelle C. and Stupnisky, Robert H. and Newall, Nancy E.} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/498"> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/498"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:creator>Ruthig, Joelle C.</dc:creator> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/498/1/Hall_et_al_2007.pdf"/> <dc:contributor>Hall, Nathan C.</dc:contributor> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-22T17:31:40Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Ruthig, Joelle C.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:title>Attributional retraining and elaborative learning : Improving academic development through writing-based interventions</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Stupnisky, Robert H.</dc:creator> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Elsevier Learning and Individual Differences 17 (2007), 3, pp. 280 290</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Attributional retraining (AR) is a motivational intervention that consistently produces improved performance by encouraging controllable failure attributions. Research suggests that cognitively engaging AR methods are ideal for high-elaborating students, whereas affect-oriented techniques are better for low-elaborating students. College students' (N=749) elaborative learning was assessed in the first semester, after which students were assigned to one of three writing-based AR conditions (No AR, Cognitive AR, Affective AR). Academic performance (course grades, GPA), motivation, attributions, and emotions were assessed in the second semester. AR by elaboration (low/high) 3×2 ANCOVAs showed optimal results for high elaborators following cognitive AR, and for low elaborators following affective AR. Performance improvements for the former were mediated by improved cognitions (expectations), and for the latter were mediated by increased positive affect.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Hall, Nathan C.</dc:creator> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dc:contributor>Perry, Raymond P.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Stupnisky, Robert H.</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-22T17:31:40Z</dcterms:available> <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format> <dc:contributor>Newall, Nancy E.</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31"/> <dc:creator>Götz, Thomas</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2007</dcterms:issued> <dc:creator>Newall, Nancy E.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Perry, Raymond P.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Götz, Thomas</dc:contributor> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/498/1/Hall_et_al_2007.pdf"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>