Publikation: Analyzing Non-Textual Content Elements to Detect Academic Plagiarism
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Identifying academic plagiarism is a pressing problem, among others, for research institutions, publishers, and funding organizations. Detection approaches proposed so far analyze lexical, syntactical, and semantic text similarity. These approaches find copied, moderately reworded, and literally translated text. However, reliably detecting disguised plagiarism, such as strong paraphrases, sense-for-sense translations, and the reuse of non-textual content and ideas, is an open research problem.
The thesis addresses this problem by proposing plagiarism detection approaches that implement a different concept—analyzing non-textual content in academic documents, such as citations, images, and mathematical content.
The thesis makes the following research contributions.
It provides the most extensive literature review on plagiarism detection technology to date. The study presents the weaknesses of current detection approaches for identifying strongly disguised plagiarism. Moreover, the survey identifies a significant research gap regarding methods that analyze features other than text.
Subsequently, the thesis summarizes work that initiated the research on analyzing non-textual content elements to detect academic plagiarism by studying citation patterns in academic documents.
To enable plagiarism checks of figures in academic documents, the thesis introduces an image-based detection process that adapts itself to the forms of image similarity typically found in academic work. The process includes established image similarity assessments and newly proposed use-case-specific methods.
To improve the identification of plagiarism in disciplines like mathematics, physics, and engineering, the thesis presents the first plagiarism detection approach that analyzes the similarity of mathematical expressions.
To demonstrate the benefit of combining non-textual and text-based detection methods, the thesis describes the first plagiarism detection system that integrates the analysis of citation-based, image-based, math-based, and text-based document similarity. The system’s user interface employs visualizations that significantly reduce the effort and time users must invest in examining content similarity.
To validate the effectiveness of the proposed detection approaches, the thesis presents five evaluations that use real cases of academic plagiarism and exploratory searches for unknown cases. Real plagiarism is committed by expert researchers with strong incentives to disguise their actions. Therefore, I consider the ability to identify such cases essential for assessing the benefit of any new plagiarism detection approach. The findings of these evaluations are as follows.
Citation-based plagiarism detection methods considerably outperformed text-based detection methods in identifying translated, paraphrased, and idea plagiarism instances. Moreover, citation-based detection methods found nine previously undiscovered cases of academic plagiarism.
The image-based plagiarism detection process proved effective for identifying frequently observed forms of image plagiarism for image types that authors typically use in academic documents.
Math-based plagiarism detection methods reliably retrieved confirmed cases of academic plagiarism involving mathematical content and identified a previously undiscovered case. Math-based detection methods offered advantages for identifying plagiarism cases that text-based methods could not detect, particularly in combination with citation-based detection methods.
These results show that non-textual content elements contain a high degree of semantic information, are language-independent, and largely immutable to the alterations that authors typically perform to conceal plagiarism. Analyzing non-textual content complements text-based detection approaches and increases the detection effectiveness, particularly for disguised forms of academic plagiarism.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
MEUSCHKE, Norman, 2021. Analyzing Non-Textual Content Elements to Detect Academic Plagiarism [Dissertation]. Konstanz: University of KonstanzBibTex
@phdthesis{Meuschke2021Analy-53952, year={2021}, doi={10.5281/zenodo.4913345}, title={Analyzing Non-Textual Content Elements to Detect Academic Plagiarism}, author={Meuschke, Norman}, address={Konstanz}, school={Universität Konstanz} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/53952"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:title>Analyzing Non-Textual Content Elements to Detect Academic Plagiarism</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-10T13:39:47Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued> <dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International</dc:rights> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53952/5/Meuschke_2-ll951b8bh8s30.pdf"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:contributor>Meuschke, Norman</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/53952/5/Meuschke_2-ll951b8bh8s30.pdf"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/53952"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/36"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2021-06-10T13:39:47Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Meuschke, Norman</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Identifying academic plagiarism is a pressing problem, among others, for research institutions, publishers, and funding organizations. Detection approaches proposed so far analyze lexical, syntactical, and semantic text similarity. These approaches find copied, moderately reworded, and literally translated text. However, reliably detecting disguised plagiarism, such as strong paraphrases, sense-for-sense translations, and the reuse of non-textual content and ideas, is an open research problem.<br /><br />The thesis addresses this problem by proposing plagiarism detection approaches that implement a different concept—analyzing non-textual content in academic documents, such as citations, images, and mathematical content.<br /><br />The thesis makes the following research contributions.<br /><br />It provides the most extensive literature review on plagiarism detection technology to date. The study presents the weaknesses of current detection approaches for identifying strongly disguised plagiarism. Moreover, the survey identifies a significant research gap regarding methods that analyze features other than text.<br /><br />Subsequently, the thesis summarizes work that initiated the research on analyzing non-textual content elements to detect academic plagiarism by studying citation patterns in academic documents.<br /><br />To enable plagiarism checks of figures in academic documents, the thesis introduces an image-based detection process that adapts itself to the forms of image similarity typically found in academic work. The process includes established image similarity assessments and newly proposed use-case-specific methods.<br /><br />To improve the identification of plagiarism in disciplines like mathematics, physics, and engineering, the thesis presents the first plagiarism detection approach that analyzes the similarity of mathematical expressions.<br /><br />To demonstrate the benefit of combining non-textual and text-based detection methods, the thesis describes the first plagiarism detection system that integrates the analysis of citation-based, image-based, math-based, and text-based document similarity. The system’s user interface employs visualizations that significantly reduce the effort and time users must invest in examining content similarity.<br /><br />To validate the effectiveness of the proposed detection approaches, the thesis presents five evaluations that use real cases of academic plagiarism and exploratory searches for unknown cases. Real plagiarism is committed by expert researchers with strong incentives to disguise their actions. Therefore, I consider the ability to identify such cases essential for assessing the benefit of any new plagiarism detection approach. The findings of these evaluations are as follows.<br /><br />Citation-based plagiarism detection methods considerably outperformed text-based detection methods in identifying translated, paraphrased, and idea plagiarism instances. Moreover, citation-based detection methods found nine previously undiscovered cases of academic plagiarism.<br /><br />The image-based plagiarism detection process proved effective for identifying frequently observed forms of image plagiarism for image types that authors typically use in academic documents.<br /><br />Math-based plagiarism detection methods reliably retrieved confirmed cases of academic plagiarism involving mathematical content and identified a previously undiscovered case. Math-based detection methods offered advantages for identifying plagiarism cases that text-based methods could not detect, particularly in combination with citation-based detection methods.<br /><br />These results show that non-textual content elements contain a high degree of semantic information, are language-independent, and largely immutable to the alterations that authors typically perform to conceal plagiarism. Analyzing non-textual content complements text-based detection approaches and increases the detection effectiveness, particularly for disguised forms of academic plagiarism.</dcterms:abstract> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>