Publikation: Trust in Scientific Expertise and the Varying Demands of Value Transparency
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Value transparency is thought to promote trust in scientific expertise. Yet, transparency is a complex concept. I will argue that transparency requirements come with a varying extent of engagement: merely disclosing information, providing information that is publicly accessible, or having additional mechanisms for criticism in place. It is often not clear in which sense transparency requirements are to be understood in the context of trust in expertise. However, each sense can backfire in different ways. Merely talking about transparency in a general sense hides these possible trade-offs. This furthermore shows that requiring transparency may come with a greater regulatory force.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
METZEN, Hanna, 2024. Trust in Scientific Expertise and the Varying Demands of Value Transparency. In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press (CUP). 2024, 54(5), S. 364-379. ISSN 0045-5091. eISSN 1911-0820. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1017/can.2025.10004BibTex
@article{Metzen2024Trust-75446,
title={Trust in Scientific Expertise and the Varying Demands of Value Transparency},
year={2024},
doi={10.1017/can.2025.10004},
number={5},
volume={54},
issn={0045-5091},
journal={Canadian Journal of Philosophy},
pages={364--379},
author={Metzen, Hanna}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/75446">
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-12-10T13:54:36Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/75446"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:creator>Metzen, Hanna</dc:creator>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-12-10T13:54:36Z</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Metzen, Hanna</dc:contributor>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:abstract>Value transparency is thought to promote trust in scientific expertise. Yet, transparency is a complex concept. I will argue that transparency requirements come with a varying extent of engagement: merely disclosing information, providing information that is publicly accessible, or having additional mechanisms for criticism in place. It is often not clear in which sense transparency requirements are to be understood in the context of trust in expertise. However, each sense can backfire in different ways. Merely talking about transparency in a general sense hides these possible trade-offs. This furthermore shows that requiring transparency may come with a greater regulatory force.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:title>Trust in Scientific Expertise and the Varying Demands of Value Transparency</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:issued>2024</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>