Publikation:

Diagnosing Homo Digitalis : towards a standardized assessment for digital tool competencies

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Stoll_2-jkx9vcp1saum2.pdf
Stoll_2-jkx9vcp1saum2.pdfGröße: 866.83 KBDownloads: 16

Datum

2024

Autor:innen

Hopfer, Karen
Lamberty, Judith
Guzmán Bausch, Francesca
Höflacher, Cosima
Króliczak, Gregory
Kalenine, Solene

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz
oops

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Research Foundation. 2024, 14, 1270437. eISSN 1664-1078. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270437

Zusammenfassung

In the 21st century, digital devices have become integral to our daily lives. Still, practical assessments designed to evaluate an individual's digital tool competencies are absent. The present study introduces the "Digital Tools Test" ("DIGI"), specifically designed for the evaluation of one's proficiency in handling common applications and functions of smartphones and tablets. The DIGI assessment has been primarily tailored for prospective use among older adults and neurological patients with the latter frequently suffering from so-called apraxia, which potentially also affects the handling of digital tools. Similar to traditional tool use tests that assess tool-selection and tool-action processes, the DIGI assessment evaluates an individual's ability to select an appropriate application for a given task (e.g. creating a new contact), their capacity to navigate within the chosen application and their competence in executing precise and accurate movements, such as swiping. We tested the implementation of the DIGI in a group of 16 healthy adults aged 18 to 28 years and 16 healthy adults aged 60 to 74 years. All participants were able to withstand the assessment and reported good acceptance. The results revealed a significant performance disparity, with older adults displaying notably lower proficiency in the DIGI. The DIGI performance of older adults exhibited a correlation with their ability to employ a set of novel mechanical tools, but not with their ability to handle a set of familiar common tools. There was no such correlation for the younger group. In conclusion, this study introduces an innovative assessment tool aimed at evaluating common digital tool competencies. Our preliminary results demonstrate good acceptance and reveal expected group differences. For current cohorts of older adults, the results seem to indicate that the ability to use novel tools may aid digital tool use. In the next step, the psychometric properties of the DIGI assessment should be evaluated in larger and more diverse samples. The advancement of digital tool competency assessments and rehabilitation strategies is essential when we aim at facilitating societal inclusion and participation for individuals in affected populations.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

digital tools, Aging, Digital competencies, assessment, Neurorehabilitation

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690STOLL, Sarah, Isabel BAUER, Karen HOPFER, Judith LAMBERTY, Verena Caroline LUNZ, Francesca GUZMÁN BAUSCH, Cosima HÖFLACHER, Gregory KRÓLICZAK, Solene KALENINE, Jennifer RANDERATH, 2024. Diagnosing Homo Digitalis : towards a standardized assessment for digital tool competencies. In: Frontiers in Psychology. Frontiers Research Foundation. 2024, 14, 1270437. eISSN 1664-1078. Available under: doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270437
BibTex
@article{Stoll2024-01-04Diagn-68751,
  year={2024},
  doi={10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270437},
  title={Diagnosing Homo Digitalis : towards a standardized assessment for digital tool competencies},
  volume={14},
  journal={Frontiers in Psychology},
  author={Stoll, Sarah and Bauer, Isabel and Hopfer, Karen and Lamberty, Judith and Lunz, Verena Caroline and Guzmán Bausch, Francesca and Höflacher, Cosima and Króliczak, Gregory and Kalenine, Solene and Randerath, Jennifer},
  note={Article Number: 1270437}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/68751">
    <dc:contributor>Stoll, Sarah</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-12-15T08:55:12Z</dcterms:available>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Stoll, Sarah</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Randerath, Jennifer</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dcterms:title>Diagnosing Homo Digitalis : towards a standardized assessment for digital tool competencies</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2024-01-04</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Bauer, Isabel</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Króliczak, Gregory</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Króliczak, Gregory</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Lamberty, Judith</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract>In the 21st century, digital devices have become integral to our daily lives. Still, practical assessments designed to evaluate an individual's digital tool competencies are absent. The present study introduces the "Digital Tools Test" ("DIGI"), specifically designed for the evaluation of one's proficiency in handling common applications and functions of smartphones and tablets. The DIGI assessment has been primarily tailored for prospective use among older adults and neurological patients with the latter frequently suffering from so-called apraxia, which potentially also affects the handling of digital tools. Similar to traditional tool use tests that assess tool-selection and tool-action processes, the DIGI assessment evaluates an individual's ability to select an appropriate application for a given task (e.g. creating a new contact), their capacity to navigate within the chosen application and their competence in executing precise and accurate movements, such as swiping. We tested the implementation of the DIGI in a group of 16 healthy adults aged 18 to 28 years and 16 healthy adults aged 60 to 74 years. All participants were able to withstand the assessment and reported good acceptance. The results revealed a significant performance disparity, with older adults displaying notably lower proficiency in the DIGI. The DIGI performance of older adults exhibited a correlation with their ability to employ a set of novel mechanical tools, but not with their ability to handle a set of familiar common tools. There was no such correlation for the younger group. In conclusion, this study introduces an innovative assessment tool aimed at evaluating common digital tool competencies. Our preliminary results demonstrate good acceptance and reveal expected group differences. For current cohorts of older adults, the results seem to indicate that the ability to use novel tools may aid digital tool use. In the next step, the psychometric properties of the DIGI assessment should be evaluated in larger and more diverse samples. The advancement of digital tool competency assessments and rehabilitation strategies is essential when we aim at facilitating societal inclusion and participation for individuals in affected populations.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:contributor>Randerath, Jennifer</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/68751/1/Stoll_2-jkx9vcp1saum2.pdf"/>
    <dc:contributor>Hopfer, Karen</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Guzmán Bausch, Francesca</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kalenine, Solene</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Höflacher, Cosima</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Guzmán Bausch, Francesca</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Hopfer, Karen</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:creator>Höflacher, Cosima</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2023-12-15T08:55:12Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Kalenine, Solene</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/68751/1/Stoll_2-jkx9vcp1saum2.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/68751"/>
    <dc:creator>Lamberty, Judith</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Lunz, Verena Caroline</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Lunz, Verena Caroline</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Bauer, Isabel</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen