Publikation: Rethinking Order : Idioms of Stability and Destabilization
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2015
Autor:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
978-3-8376-2472-4
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Bielefeld: transcript
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Stability is at the core of every discussion of order, organization or institutionalization. From an »inside« perspective, the stability of each order-constituting element is assumed. In contrast, in critical discourses instability (e.g. through ambiguity or non-control) is located at the outside of the social order as its negative. By treating this argumentative symmetrical structure as »idioms of stability and destabilization«, the articles try to rethink order: How can we describe structures from a perspective in which instability, non-control and irrationality are not contrary to ordering systems, but contribute to their stability? How might the notions of identity, knowledge and institutions in social and cultural studies be contested by this change of perspective?
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
Schlagwörter
order, stability, idiom, social analysis
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
FALKENHAYNER, Nicole, ed., Andreas LANGENOHL, ed., Johannes SCHEU, ed., Doris SCHWEITZER, ed., Kacper SZULECKI, ed., 2015. Rethinking Order : Idioms of Stability and Destabilization. Bielefeld: transcript. ISBN 978-3-8376-2472-4BibTex
@book{Falkenhayner2015Rethi-32481,
year={2015},
isbn={978-3-8376-2472-4},
publisher={transcript},
address={Bielefeld},
title={Rethinking Order : Idioms of Stability and Destabilization},
editor={Falkenhayner, Nicole and Langenohl, Andreas and Scheu, Johannes and Schweitzer, Doris and Szulecki, Kacper}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32481">
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:contributor>Schweitzer, Doris</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Scheu, Johannes</dc:contributor>
<dc:publisher>transcript</dc:publisher>
<dcterms:title>Rethinking Order : Idioms of Stability and Destabilization</dcterms:title>
<dc:contributor>Szulecki, Kacper</dc:contributor>
<dc:contributor>Langenohl, Andreas</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/32481"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
<bibo:issn>978-3-8376-2472-4</bibo:issn>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-12-21T08:44:01Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Stability is at the core of every discussion of order, organization or institutionalization. From an »inside« perspective, the stability of each order-constituting element is assumed. In contrast, in critical discourses instability (e.g. through ambiguity or non-control) is located at the outside of the social order as its negative. By treating this argumentative symmetrical structure as »idioms of stability and destabilization«, the articles try to rethink order: How can we describe structures from a perspective in which instability, non-control and irrationality are not contrary to ordering systems, but contribute to their stability? How might the notions of identity, knowledge and institutions in social and cultural studies be contested by this change of perspective?</dcterms:abstract>
<dc:publisher>Bielefeld</dc:publisher>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34"/>
<dc:contributor>Falkenhayner, Nicole</dc:contributor>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-12-21T08:44:01Z</dc:date>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
