Publikation: Cultural Sociology, Modes of Inquiry, and Political Analysis: A Rejoinder to Steensland
Lade...
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2009
Autor:innen
Smith, Philip
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Sociological forum : official journal of the Eastern Sociological Society. 2009, 24(4), pp. 935-939. ISSN 0884-8971. eISSN 1573-7861. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01146.x
Zusammenfassung
Closely bounded research programs are both common and effective in sociology. Describing such programs as operating with a restricted code is deeply problematic. These matters aside, the remarkable rise of cultural sociology in fact reflects adaptation to sociology's disciplinary norms and core thematic concerns. Steensland (2009) might better have reversed his argument: faced with the achievements of cultural analysis, the slumbering giant called mainstream sociology should wake up.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie
Schlagwörter
boundaries, communication, culture, discourse, intellectual communities, politics
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
SMITH, Philip, 2009. Cultural Sociology, Modes of Inquiry, and Political Analysis: A Rejoinder to Steensland. In: Sociological forum : official journal of the Eastern Sociological Society. 2009, 24(4), pp. 935-939. ISSN 0884-8971. eISSN 1573-7861. Available under: doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01146.xBibTex
@article{Smith2009Cultu-3076,
year={2009},
doi={10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01146.x},
title={Cultural Sociology, Modes of Inquiry, and Political Analysis: A Rejoinder to Steensland},
number={4},
volume={24},
issn={0884-8971},
journal={Sociological forum : official journal of the Eastern Sociological Society},
pages={935--939},
author={Smith, Philip}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/3076">
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30"/>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34438"/>
<dcterms:issued>2009</dcterms:issued>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/3076"/>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/30"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T10:17:57Z</dcterms:available>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T10:17:57Z</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Smith, Philip</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Sociological forum : official journal of the Eastern Sociological Society 24 (2009), 4, pp. 935-939</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Closely bounded research programs are both common and effective in sociology. Describing such programs as operating with a restricted code is deeply problematic. These matters aside, the remarkable rise of cultural sociology in fact reflects adaptation to sociology's disciplinary norms and core thematic concerns. Steensland (2009) might better have reversed his argument: faced with the achievements of cultural analysis, the slumbering giant called mainstream sociology should wake up.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/34438"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dc:creator>Smith, Philip</dc:creator>
<dcterms:title>Cultural Sociology, Modes of Inquiry, and Political Analysis: A Rejoinder to Steensland</dcterms:title>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
