Publikation:

Unequal German Democracy and the Rise of the 'Lifestyle-Left'? : How Left Parties in Germany Conceive of (In)Equality, 1970–2021

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2025

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): Grant Number 428250727
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG): Spielarten des Egalitarismus

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

German Politics. Taylor & Francis. ISSN 0964-4008. eISSN 1743-8993. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/09644008.2025.2453242

Zusammenfassung

Debates about the alleged pivot of left parties away from their traditional core concern with economic equality towards concerns with equal rights are rampant in Germany – both in political and academic circles. Often, they are inspired by developments in other countries, where centre-left parties have turned to progressive neoliberalism (i.e. equal rights concerns are more salient than redistribution) or a more communitarian profile (i.e. redistribution over equal rights). Based on new data on left parties’ equality concepts we assess claims about the rise of the so-called lifestyle-left – a term used in the German debate instead of progressive neoliberalism. Comparing and tracking the three German left parties between 1970 and 2021, we find three egalitarian trajectories that question and qualify this controversial, but so far untestable, claim. Die Linke is still prioritising economic and regional equality. The SPD has indeed de-emphasised economic equality but started to reemphasise it in 2017. While the Greens indeed prioritise equal rights over economic equality, they have done so consistently since the party’s founding (with very few exceptions, e.g. in 2013) – so this is not a new trend either. In sum, we caution against sweeping claims about changes of German left parties towards a lifestyle-left.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690HORN, Alexander, Jonathan KLÜSER, Simon RITTERSHAUS, Martin HASELMAYER, 2025. Unequal German Democracy and the Rise of the 'Lifestyle-Left'? : How Left Parties in Germany Conceive of (In)Equality, 1970–2021. In: German Politics. Taylor & Francis. ISSN 0964-4008. eISSN 1743-8993. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1080/09644008.2025.2453242
BibTex
@article{Horn2025-03-12Unequ-72696,
  title={Unequal German Democracy and the Rise of the 'Lifestyle-Left'? : How Left Parties in Germany Conceive of (In)Equality, 1970–2021},
  year={2025},
  doi={10.1080/09644008.2025.2453242},
  issn={0964-4008},
  journal={German Politics},
  author={Horn, Alexander and Klüser, Jonathan and Rittershaus, Simon and Haselmayer, Martin}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/72696">
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-03-19T07:04:49Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43613"/>
    <dcterms:abstract>Debates about the alleged pivot of left parties away from their traditional core concern with economic equality towards concerns with equal rights are rampant in Germany – both in political and academic circles. Often, they are inspired by developments in other countries, where centre-left parties have turned to progressive neoliberalism (i.e. equal rights concerns are more salient than redistribution) or a more communitarian profile (i.e. redistribution over equal rights). Based on new data on left parties’ equality concepts we assess claims about the rise of the so-called lifestyle-left – a term used in the German debate instead of progressive neoliberalism. Comparing and tracking the three German left parties between 1970 and 2021, we find three egalitarian trajectories that question and qualify this controversial, but so far untestable, claim. Die Linke is still prioritising economic and regional equality. The SPD has indeed de-emphasised economic equality but started to reemphasise it in 2017. While the Greens indeed prioritise equal rights over economic equality, they have done so consistently since the party’s founding (with very few exceptions, e.g. in 2013) – so this is not a new trend either. In sum, we caution against sweeping claims about changes of German left parties towards a lifestyle-left.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:issued>2025-03-12</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:title>Unequal German Democracy and the Rise of the 'Lifestyle-Left'? : How Left Parties in Germany Conceive of (In)Equality, 1970–2021</dcterms:title>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Klüser, Jonathan</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Klüser, Jonathan</dc:contributor>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Haselmayer, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2025-03-19T07:04:49Z</dcterms:available>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/72696"/>
    <dc:creator>Haselmayer, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Rittershaus, Simon</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Horn, Alexander</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Horn, Alexander</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Rittershaus, Simon</dc:creator>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Online First: Zeitschriftenartikel, die schon vor ihrer Zuordnung zu einem bestimmten Zeitschriftenheft (= Issue) online gestellt werden. Online First-Artikel werden auf der Homepage des Journals in der Verlagsfassung veröffentlicht.
Diese Publikation teilen