Publikation: A latent semantic analysis of gender stereotype-consistency and narrowness in American English
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Using latent semantic analysis, we examined gender stereotypes in American English by submitting over 100 masculine, neutral, and feminine role-words and trait-words to pair-wise semantic similarity comparisons with masculine (man, he, him) and feminine (woman, she, her) referents separately. We expected to find: (a) Stereotyping—roles and traits would be more semantically similar to the ostensible ‘matching’ than ‘mismatching’ gender category referent; (b) Categorical narrowness—both categories would be less semantically similar to counterstereotypical than to neutral or stereotypical characteristics; but this would be especially so for the male category, indicating its relatively greater narrowness. Results supported these hypotheses, but only among role-words. American English reflects and reinforces gender stereotypes regarding gender roles at a level beyond that recognized previously.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
LENTON, Alison P., Constantine SEDIKIDES, Martin BRUDER, 2008. A latent semantic analysis of gender stereotype-consistency and narrowness in American English. In: Sex Roles. 2008, 60(3-4), pp. 269-278. ISSN 0360-0025. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9534-zBibTex
@article{Lenton2008laten-14749, year={2008}, doi={10.1007/s11199-008-9534-z}, title={A latent semantic analysis of gender stereotype-consistency and narrowness in American English}, number={3-4}, volume={60}, issn={0360-0025}, journal={Sex Roles}, pages={269--278}, author={Lenton, Alison P. and Sedikides, Constantine and Bruder, Martin} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/14749"> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-08-17T09:17:13Z</dcterms:available> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:creator>Lenton, Alison P.</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Sedikides, Constantine</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/14749"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Bruder, Martin</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2008</dcterms:issued> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-08-17T09:17:13Z</dc:date> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Using latent semantic analysis, we examined gender stereotypes in American English by submitting over 100 masculine, neutral, and feminine role-words and trait-words to pair-wise semantic similarity comparisons with masculine (man, he, him) and feminine (woman, she, her) referents separately. We expected to find: (a) Stereotyping—roles and traits would be more semantically similar to the ostensible ‘matching’ than ‘mismatching’ gender category referent; (b) Categorical narrowness—both categories would be less semantically similar to counterstereotypical than to neutral or stereotypical characteristics; but this would be especially so for the male category, indicating its relatively greater narrowness. Results supported these hypotheses, but only among role-words. American English reflects and reinforces gender stereotypes regarding gender roles at a level beyond that recognized previously.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>A latent semantic analysis of gender stereotype-consistency and narrowness in American English</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Bruder, Martin</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dc:creator>Sedikides, Constantine</dc:creator> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Sex Roles 60 (2009), 3-4, pp. 269-278</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/52"/> <dc:contributor>Lenton, Alison P.</dc:contributor> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>