Publikation:

On the pure logic of justified belief

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Schuster_2-hle2x4a3zsr87.pdf
Schuster_2-hle2x4a3zsr87.pdfGröße: 389.24 KBDownloads: 88

Datum

2022

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Hybrid
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Synthese. Springer. 2022, 200(5), 425. ISSN 0039-7857. eISSN 1573-0964. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03905-6

Zusammenfassung

Justified belief is a core concept in epistemology and there has been an increasing interest in its logic over the last years. While many logical investigations consider justified belief as an operator, in this paper, we propose a logic for justified belief in which the relevant notion is treated as a predicate instead. Although this gives rise to the possibility of liar-like paradoxes, a predicate treatment allows for a rich and highly expressive framework, which lives up to the universal ambitions of investigating epistemological concepts. We start with a base theory for justified belief, and then systematically present putative additional axioms for justified belief. We provide an overview of (in)consistency results when the additional principles are added to the base theory, and discuss their philosophical plausibility.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690SCHUSTER, Daniela, Leon HORSTEN, 2022. On the pure logic of justified belief. In: Synthese. Springer. 2022, 200(5), 425. ISSN 0039-7857. eISSN 1573-0964. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.1007/s11229-022-03905-6
BibTex
@article{Schuster2022-10-12logic-58929,
  year={2022},
  doi={10.1007/s11229-022-03905-6},
  title={On the pure logic of justified belief},
  number={5},
  volume={200},
  issn={0039-7857},
  journal={Synthese},
  author={Schuster, Daniela and Horsten, Leon},
  note={Article Number: 425}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/58929">
    <dc:creator>Horsten, Leon</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:creator>Schuster, Daniela</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Justified belief is a core concept in epistemology and there has been an increasing interest in its logic over the last years. While many logical investigations consider justified belief as an operator, in this paper, we propose a logic for justified belief in which the relevant notion is treated as a predicate instead. Although this gives rise to the possibility of liar-like paradoxes, a predicate treatment allows for a rich and highly expressive framework, which lives up to the universal ambitions of investigating epistemological concepts. We start with a base theory for justified belief, and then systematically present putative additional axioms for justified belief. We provide an overview of (in)consistency results when the additional principles are added to the base theory, and discuss their philosophical plausibility.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:title>On the pure logic of justified belief</dcterms:title>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-10-27T11:54:02Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Schuster, Daniela</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/58929/1/Schuster_2-hle2x4a3zsr87.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"/>
    <dc:rights>Attribution 4.0 International</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:issued>2022-10-12</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-10-27T11:54:02Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/58929/1/Schuster_2-hle2x4a3zsr87.pdf"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/58929"/>
    <dc:contributor>Horsten, Leon</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen