Different Approaches, Different Results in Small State Studies : Complementary Views on the Monarchy and Traditional Governance in Liechtenstein

Wolf, Sebastian

Different Approaches, Different Results in Small State Studies : Complementary Views on the Monarchy and Traditional Governance in Liechtenstein

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2015

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

unikn.publication.listelement.citation.prefix.version.undefined

Swiss Political Science Review. 2015, 21(2), pp. 350-361. ISSN 1424-7755. eISSN 1662-6370. Available under: doi: 10.1111/spsr.12151

Zusammenfassung

The research note comments on W. Veenendaal's article “A Big Prince in a Tiny Realm: Smallness, Monarchy, and Political Legitimacy in the Principality of Liechtenstein”. It is argued, inter alia, that the phenomenon of “princely self-restraint” should not be underestimated in Liechtenstein's constitutional reality. The character of the microstate's actual political system strongly depends on the individual personality of the Reigning Prince. A strong monarch who acts as a political actor with his own agenda should not be conceptualized as a neutral traditional leader. From the perspective of many citizens of Liechtenstein, the principality's political system is legitimate since it combines traditional authority and legal-rational authority in a unique way. Largely due to the powerful role of the government, the microstate is characterized by consensus-oriented hierarchical governance. Elite surveys can be seen as a useful instrument to overcome some of the methodological pitfalls of the elite interview approach.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Liechtenstein, Democracy, Monarchy, Legitimacy, Small state

Zitieren

ISO 690

WOLF, Sebastian, 2015. Different Approaches, Different Results in Small State Studies : Complementary Views on the Monarchy and Traditional Governance in Liechtenstein. In: Swiss Political Science Review. 2015, 21(2), pp. 350-361. ISSN 1424-7755. eISSN 1662-6370. Available under: doi: 10.1111/spsr.12151

BibTex

@article{Wolf2015Diffe-31885,
  year={2015},
  doi={10.1111/spsr.12151},
  title={Different Approaches, Different Results in Small State Studies : Complementary Views on the Monarchy and Traditional Governance in Liechtenstein},
  number={2},
  volume={21},
  issn={1424-7755},
  journal={Swiss Political Science Review},
  pages={350--361},
  author={Wolf, Sebastian}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/31885">
    <dc:contributor>Wolf, Sebastian</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-10-02T12:31:15Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dcterms:title>Different Approaches, Different Results in Small State Studies : Complementary Views on the Monarchy and Traditional Governance in Liechtenstein</dcterms:title>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/31885"/>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-10-02T12:31:15Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Wolf, Sebastian</dc:creator>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The research note comments on W. Veenendaal's article “A Big Prince in a Tiny Realm: Smallness, Monarchy, and Political Legitimacy in the Principality of Liechtenstein”. It is argued, inter alia, that the phenomenon of “princely self-restraint” should not be underestimated in Liechtenstein's constitutional reality. The character of the microstate's actual political system strongly depends on the individual personality of the Reigning Prince. A strong monarch who acts as a political actor with his own agenda should not be conceptualized as a neutral traditional leader. From the perspective of many citizens of Liechtenstein, the principality's political system is legitimate since it combines traditional authority and legal-rational authority in a unique way. Largely due to the powerful role of the government, the microstate is characterized by consensus-oriented hierarchical governance. Elite surveys can be seen as a useful instrument to overcome some of the methodological pitfalls of the elite interview approach.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja