Publikation: Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ „De anima“ rezipiert?
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Abstract: The search for an answer to the question that constitutes the title has led to some insightful results concerning Kurt Gödel’s critical reception of major philosophical works. It shows how he uses philosophical argumentations of classical authors and turns them into new aspects for his own philosophical argumentation. In the case at hand a classical argument by Aristotle for the immaterialness of the soul is used by Gödel in order to add considerations to his own reasoning for the inexhaustibility of mathematics, the mind-body-problem and his considerations about God; and vice versa to give new insights into an argument with a long history of reception.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Résumé: La recherche d’une réponse à la question qui constitue le titre a conduit à des éclair-cissements concernant la réception critique d’oeuvres philosophiques majeures par Kurt Gödel. Cela montre comment il utilise des argumentations philosophiques d’auteurs classi-ques et les change en des aspects nouveaux pour sa propre argumentation philosophique. Dans le cas qui nous concerne, Gödel emploie un argument classique d’Aristote pour l’immatérialité de l’âme afin d'ajouter certaines considérations à son propre raisonnement concernant l’inexhaustibilité des mathématiques, le problème du corps et de l’esprit, et ses considérations à propos de Dieu. Et réciproquement, il fournit de nouveaux éclaircissements concernant un argument dont la réception a une longue histoire.
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
ENGELEN, Eva-Maria, 2013. Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ „De anima“ rezipiert?. In: Philosophia Scientiae. 2013, 17(1), pp. 167-188. eISSN 1281-2463BibTex
@article{Engelen2013Godel-25173,
year={2013},
title={Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ „De anima“ rezipiert?},
number={1},
volume={17},
journal={Philosophia Scientiae},
pages={167--188},
author={Engelen, Eva-Maria}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/25173">
<dcterms:alternative>Has Kurt Gödel received Thomas Aquinas’ Commentary on Aristotle’s „De anima“?</dcterms:alternative>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
<dcterms:issued>2013</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-11-20T16:31:18Z</dcterms:available>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<dc:creator>Engelen, Eva-Maria</dc:creator>
<dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Philosophia Scientiae ; 17 (2013), 1. - S. 167-188</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2013-11-20T16:31:18Z</dc:date>
<dc:contributor>Engelen, Eva-Maria</dc:contributor>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/25173"/>
<dc:language>deu</dc:language>
<dcterms:title>Hat Kurt Gödel Thomas von Aquins Kommentar zu Aristoteles’ „De anima“ rezipiert?</dcterms:title>
<dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">Abstract: The search for an answer to the question that constitutes the title has led to some insightful results concerning Kurt Gödel’s critical reception of major philosophical works. It shows how he uses philosophical argumentations of classical authors and turns them into new aspects for his own philosophical argumentation. In the case at hand a classical argument by Aristotle for the immaterialness of the soul is used by Gödel in order to add considerations to his own reasoning for the inexhaustibility of mathematics, the mind-body-problem and his considerations about God; and vice versa to give new insights into an argument with a long history of reception.</dcterms:abstract>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
