Publikation:

Appraisal of health care : from patient value to societal benefit

Lade...
Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2010

Autor:innen

Porzsolt, Franz
Maute-Stephan, Carola
Kindervater, Ralf
Geldmacher, Jan
Meierkord, Sigrid
Sigle, Jörg M.
Eisemann, Martin

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Journal of public health. 2010, 18(3), pp. 297-302. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10389-009-0294-1

Zusammenfassung

Aim
This paper summarizes the deficiencies and weaknesses of the most frequently used methods for the allocation of health-care resources. New, more transparent and practical methods for optimizing the allocation of these resources are proposed.
Method
The examples of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and efficiency frontier (EF) are analyzed to describe weaknesses and problems in decisions regulating health-care provision. After conducting a literature search and discussions with an international group of professionals, three groups of professionals were formed to discuss the assessment and appraisal of health-care services and allocation of available resources.
Results
At least seven essential variables were identified that should be heeded when applying the concept of QALYs for decisions concerning health-care provision. The efficiency frontier (EF) concept can be used to set a ceiling price and perform a cost-benefit analysis of provision, but different stakeholders a biostatistician (efficacy), an economist (costs), a clinician (effectiveness), and the patient (value) could provide a fairer appraisal of health-care services. Efficacy and costs are often based on falsifiable data. Effectiveness and value depend on the success with which a particular clinical problem has been solved. These data cannot be falsified. The societal perspective is generated by an informal cost-benefit analysis including appraisals by the above-mentioned stakeholders and carried out by an authorized institution.
Conclusion
Our analysis suggests that study results expressed in QALYs or as EF cannot be compared unless the variables included in the calculation are specified. It would be far more objective and comprehensive if an authorized institution made an informal decision based on formal assessments of the effectiveness of health-care services evaluated by health-care providers, of the value assessed by consumers, of efficacy described by biostatisticians, and of costs calculated by economists.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

Health-care appraisal, patient s value, society s benefit

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690PORZSOLT, Franz, Holger PRESSEL, Carola MAUTE-STEPHAN, Ralf KINDERVATER, Jan GELDMACHER, Sigrid MEIERKORD, Jörg M. SIGLE, Martin EISEMANN, 2010. Appraisal of health care : from patient value to societal benefit. In: Journal of public health. 2010, 18(3), pp. 297-302. Available under: doi: 10.1007/s10389-009-0294-1
BibTex
@article{Porzsolt2010Appra-2767,
  year={2010},
  doi={10.1007/s10389-009-0294-1},
  title={Appraisal of health care : from patient value to societal benefit},
  number={3},
  volume={18},
  journal={Journal of public health},
  pages={297--302},
  author={Porzsolt, Franz and Pressel, Holger and Maute-Stephan, Carola and Kindervater, Ralf and Geldmacher, Jan and Meierkord, Sigrid and Sigle, Jörg M. and Eisemann, Martin}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/2767">
    <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>Publ. in: Journal of public health 18 (2010), 3, pp. 297-302</dcterms:bibliographicCitation>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Pressel, Holger</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Maute-Stephan, Carola</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Eisemann, Martin</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Kindervater, Ralf</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Sigle, Jörg M.</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Aim&lt;br /&gt;This paper summarizes the deficiencies and weaknesses of the most frequently used methods for the allocation of health-care resources. New, more transparent and practical methods for optimizing the allocation of these resources are proposed.&lt;br /&gt;Method&lt;br /&gt;The examples of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and efficiency frontier (EF) are analyzed to describe weaknesses and problems in decisions regulating health-care provision. After conducting a literature search and discussions with an international group of professionals, three groups of professionals were formed to discuss the assessment and appraisal of health-care services and allocation of available resources.&lt;br /&gt;Results&lt;br /&gt;At least seven essential variables were identified that should be heeded when applying the concept of QALYs for decisions concerning health-care provision. The efficiency frontier (EF) concept can be used to set a ceiling price and perform a cost-benefit analysis of provision, but different stakeholders a biostatistician (efficacy), an economist (costs), a clinician (effectiveness), and the patient (value) could provide a fairer appraisal of health-care services. Efficacy and costs are often based on falsifiable data. Effectiveness and value depend on the success with which a particular clinical problem has been solved. These data cannot be falsified. The societal perspective is generated by an informal cost-benefit analysis including appraisals by the above-mentioned stakeholders and carried out by an authorized institution.&lt;br /&gt;Conclusion&lt;br /&gt;Our analysis suggests that study results expressed in QALYs or as EF cannot be compared unless the variables included in the calculation are specified. It would be far more objective and comprehensive if an authorized institution made an informal decision based on formal assessments of the effectiveness of health-care services evaluated by health-care providers, of the value assessed by consumers, of efficacy described by biostatisticians, and of costs calculated by economists.</dcterms:abstract>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/2767"/>
    <dc:creator>Geldmacher, Jan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Meierkord, Sigrid</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>Porzsolt, Franz</dc:creator>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:contributor>Pressel, Holger</dc:contributor>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T10:01:28Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Sigle, Jörg M.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Kindervater, Ralf</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Maute-Stephan, Carola</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Meierkord, Sigrid</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2011-03-23T10:01:28Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:title>Appraisal of health care : from patient value to societal benefit</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:issued>2010</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dc:contributor>Porzsolt, Franz</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:contributor>Eisemann, Martin</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Geldmacher, Jan</dc:contributor>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen