Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
Vorschaubild nicht verfügbar
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2016
Autor:innen
Anderson, Christopher J.
Bahnik, Stephan
Barnett-Cowan, Michael
Bosco, Frank A.
Chandler, Jesse
Chartier, Christopher R.
Cheung, Felix
Christopherson, Cody D.
Zuni, Kellylynn
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
eISSN
item.preview.dc.identifier.isbn
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
oops
EU-Projektnummer
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Science ; 351 (2016), 6277. - 1037. - ISSN 0036-8075. - eISSN 1095-9203
Zusammenfassung
Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Zitieren
ISO 690
ANDERSON, Christopher J., Stephan BAHNIK, Michael BARNETT-COWAN, Frank A. BOSCO, Jesse CHANDLER, Christopher R. CHARTIER, Felix CHEUNG, Cody D. CHRISTOPHERSON, Stefan STIEGER, Kellylynn ZUNI, 2016. Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". In: Science. 351(6277), 1037. ISSN 0036-8075. eISSN 1095-9203. Available under: doi: 10.1126/science.aad9163BibTex
@article{Anderson2016-03-04Respo-33887, year={2016}, doi={10.1126/science.aad9163}, title={Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"}, number={6277}, volume={351}, issn={0036-8075}, journal={Science}, author={Anderson, Christopher J. and Bahnik, Stephan and Barnett-Cowan, Michael and Bosco, Frank A. and Chandler, Jesse and Chartier, Christopher R. and Cheung, Felix and Christopherson, Cody D. and Stieger, Stefan and Zuni, Kellylynn}, note={Article Number: 1037} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/33887"> <dc:creator>Christopherson, Cody D.</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-05-12T09:25:37Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Cheung, Felix</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Chartier, Christopher R.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Bosco, Frank A.</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Barnett-Cowan, Michael</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Stieger, Stefan</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Cheung, Felix</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Barnett-Cowan, Michael</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Anderson, Christopher J.</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Bahnik, Stephan</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Bahnik, Stephan</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Christopherson, Cody D.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Zuni, Kellylynn</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-05-12T09:25:37Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Anderson, Christopher J.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Zuni, Kellylynn</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Stieger, Stefan</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Chartier, Christopher R.</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:title>Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Chandler, Jesse</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2016-03-04</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Bosco, Frank A.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Chandler, Jesse</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33887"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja