Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"

Anderson, Christopher J.; Bahnik, Stephan; Barnett-Cowan, Michael; Bosco, Frank A.; Chandler, Jesse; Chartier, Christopher R.; Cheung, Felix; Christopherson, Cody D.; Stieger, Stefan; Zuni, Kellylynn

Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"

Files

There are no files associated with this item.

Date

2016

Authors

Anderson, Christopher J.

Bahnik, Stephan

Barnett-Cowan, Michael

Bosco, Frank A.

Chandler, Jesse

Chartier, Christopher R.

Cheung, Felix

Christopherson, Cody D.

Stieger, Stefan

Zuni, Kellylynn

DOI (citable link)

10.1126/science.aad9163

Collections

Psychologie

Publication type

Journal article

Publication status

Published

Published in

Science ; 351 (2016), 6277. - 1037. - ISSN 0036-8075. - eISSN 1095-9203

Abstract

Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.

Subject (DDC)

150 Psychology

Cite This

ISO 690

ANDERSON, Christopher J., Stephan BAHNIK, Michael BARNETT-COWAN, Frank A. BOSCO, Jesse CHANDLER, Christopher R. CHARTIER, Felix CHEUNG, Cody D. CHRISTOPHERSON, Stefan STIEGER, Kellylynn ZUNI, 2016. Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". In: Science. 351(6277), 1037. ISSN 0036-8075. eISSN 1095-9203. Available under: doi: 10.1126/science.aad9163

BibTex

@article{Anderson2016-03-04Respo-33887,
  year={2016},
  doi={10.1126/science.aad9163},
  title={Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"},
  number={6277},
  volume={351},
  issn={0036-8075},
  journal={Science},
  author={Anderson, Christopher J. and Bahnik, Stephan and Barnett-Cowan, Michael and Bosco, Frank A. and Chandler, Jesse and Chartier, Christopher R. and Cheung, Felix and Christopherson, Cody D. and Stieger, Stefan and Zuni, Kellylynn},
  note={Article Number: 1037}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/33887">
    <dc:creator>Christopherson, Cody D.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-05-12T09:25:37Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Cheung, Felix</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Chartier, Christopher R.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Bosco, Frank A.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Barnett-Cowan, Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Stieger, Stefan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Cheung, Felix</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Barnett-Cowan, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Anderson, Christopher J.</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Bahnik, Stephan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Bahnik, Stephan</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Christopherson, Cody D.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Zuni, Kellylynn</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-05-12T09:25:37Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Anderson, Christopher J.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Zuni, Kellylynn</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Stieger, Stefan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Chartier, Christopher R.</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Chandler, Jesse</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2016-03-04</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Bosco, Frank A.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Chandler, Jesse</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33887"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Bibliography of Konstanz

Yes