Publikation:

Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.

Datum

2016

Autor:innen

Anderson, Christopher J.
Bahnik, Stephan
Barnett-Cowan, Michael
Bosco, Frank A.
Chandler, Jesse
Chartier, Christopher R.
Cheung, Felix
Christopherson, Cody D.
Zuni, Kellylynn
et al.

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad9163
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Sammlungen

Psychologie: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Science. 2016, 351(6277), 1037. ISSN 0036-8075. eISSN 1095-9203. Available under: doi: 10.1126/science.aad9163

Zusammenfassung

Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
150 Psychologie

Schlagwörter

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Zugehörige Datensätze in KOPS

Zitieren

ISO 690ANDERSON, Christopher J., Stephan BAHNIK, Michael BARNETT-COWAN, Frank A. BOSCO, Jesse CHANDLER, Christopher R. CHARTIER, Felix CHEUNG, Cody D. CHRISTOPHERSON, Stefan STIEGER, Kellylynn ZUNI, 2016. Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". In: Science. 2016, 351(6277), 1037. ISSN 0036-8075. eISSN 1095-9203. Available under: doi: 10.1126/science.aad9163
BibTex
@article{Anderson2016-03-04Respo-33887,
  year={2016},
  doi={10.1126/science.aad9163},
  title={Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"},
  number={6277},
  volume={351},
  issn={0036-8075},
  journal={Science},
  author={Anderson, Christopher J. and Bahnik, Stephan and Barnett-Cowan, Michael and Bosco, Frank A. and Chandler, Jesse and Chartier, Christopher R. and Cheung, Felix and Christopherson, Cody D. and Stieger, Stefan and Zuni, Kellylynn},
  note={Article Number: 1037}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/33887">
    <dc:creator>Christopherson, Cody D.</dc:creator>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-05-12T09:25:37Z</dc:date>
    <dc:contributor>Cheung, Felix</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Chartier, Christopher R.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Bosco, Frank A.</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:creator>Barnett-Cowan, Michael</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Stieger, Stefan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Cheung, Felix</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Barnett-Cowan, Michael</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Anderson, Christopher J.</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/>
    <dc:contributor>Bahnik, Stephan</dc:contributor>
    <dc:creator>Bahnik, Stephan</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Christopherson, Cody D.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Zuni, Kellylynn</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-05-12T09:25:37Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:creator>Anderson, Christopher J.</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Zuni, Kellylynn</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Stieger, Stefan</dc:creator>
    <dc:creator>Chartier, Christopher R.</dc:creator>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:title>Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"</dcterms:title>
    <dc:creator>Chandler, Jesse</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:issued>2016-03-04</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:contributor>Bosco, Frank A.</dc:contributor>
    <dc:contributor>Chandler, Jesse</dc:contributor>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33887"/>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen