Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2016
Authors
Anderson, Christopher J.
Bahnik, Stephan
Barnett-Cowan, Michael
Bosco, Frank A.
Chandler, Jesse
Chartier, Christopher R.
Cheung, Felix
Christopherson, Cody D.
Zuni, Kellylynn
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
oops
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Science ; 351 (2016), 6277. - 1037. - ISSN 0036-8075. - eISSN 1095-9203
Abstract
Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
ANDERSON, Christopher J., Stephan BAHNIK, Michael BARNETT-COWAN, Frank A. BOSCO, Jesse CHANDLER, Christopher R. CHARTIER, Felix CHEUNG, Cody D. CHRISTOPHERSON, Stefan STIEGER, Kellylynn ZUNI, 2016. Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". In: Science. 351(6277), 1037. ISSN 0036-8075. eISSN 1095-9203. Available under: doi: 10.1126/science.aad9163BibTex
@article{Anderson2016-03-04Respo-33887, year={2016}, doi={10.1126/science.aad9163}, title={Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"}, number={6277}, volume={351}, issn={0036-8075}, journal={Science}, author={Anderson, Christopher J. and Bahnik, Stephan and Barnett-Cowan, Michael and Bosco, Frank A. and Chandler, Jesse and Chartier, Christopher R. and Cheung, Felix and Christopherson, Cody D. and Stieger, Stefan and Zuni, Kellylynn}, note={Article Number: 1037} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/33887"> <dc:creator>Christopherson, Cody D.</dc:creator> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-05-12T09:25:37Z</dc:date> <dc:contributor>Cheung, Felix</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Chartier, Christopher R.</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Bosco, Frank A.</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Gilbert et al. conclude that evidence from the Open Science Collaboration's Reproducibility Project: Psychology indicates high reproducibility, given the study methodology. Their very optimistic assessment is limited by statistical misconceptions and by causal inferences from selectively interpreted, correlational data. Using the Reproducibility Project: Psychology data, both optimistic and pessimistic conclusions about reproducibility are possible, and neither are yet warranted.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Barnett-Cowan, Michael</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Stieger, Stefan</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Cheung, Felix</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Barnett-Cowan, Michael</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Anderson, Christopher J.</dc:contributor> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Bahnik, Stephan</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Bahnik, Stephan</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Christopherson, Cody D.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Zuni, Kellylynn</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2016-05-12T09:25:37Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Anderson, Christopher J.</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Zuni, Kellylynn</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Stieger, Stefan</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Chartier, Christopher R.</dc:creator> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:title>Response to Comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science"</dcterms:title> <dc:creator>Chandler, Jesse</dc:creator> <dcterms:issued>2016-03-04</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Bosco, Frank A.</dc:contributor> <dc:contributor>Chandler, Jesse</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/33887"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes