Forms and Norms of Indecision in Argumentation Theory

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Schuster_2-f8tljn56wi058.pdf
Schuster_2-f8tljn56wi058.pdfGröße: 355.51 KBDownloads: 44
Datum
2021
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Konferenzband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
LIU, Fenrong, ed., Alessandra MARRA, ed., Paul PORTNER, ed., Frederik VAN DE PUTTE, ed.. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021. Rickmansworth: College Publications, 2021, pp. 394-413. ISBN 978-1-84890-352-4
Zusammenfassung

One main goal of argumentation theory is to evaluate arguments and to determine whether they should be accepted or rejected. When there is no clear answer, a third option, being undecided, has to be taken into account. Indecision is often not considered explicitly, but rather taken to be a collection of all unclear or troubling cases. However, current philosophy makes a strong point for taking indecision itself to be a proper object of consideration. This paper aims at revealing parallels between the findings concerning indecision in philosophy and the treatment of indecision in argumentation theory. By investigating what philosophical forms and norms of indecision are involved in argumentation theory, we can improve our understanding of the different uncertain evidential situations in argumentation theory.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Labelling Approach, Statement Labelling, Indecision, Doxastic Indecision, Suspension of Judgement
Konferenz
Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021, 21. Juli 2021 - 24. Juli 2021, München
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690SCHUSTER, Daniela, 2021. Forms and Norms of Indecision in Argumentation Theory. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021. München, 21. Juli 2021 - 24. Juli 2021. In: LIU, Fenrong, ed., Alessandra MARRA, ed., Paul PORTNER, ed., Frederik VAN DE PUTTE, ed.. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021. Rickmansworth: College Publications, 2021, pp. 394-413. ISBN 978-1-84890-352-4
BibTex
@inproceedings{Schuster2021Forms-56744,
  year={2021},
  title={Forms and Norms of Indecision in Argumentation Theory},
  url={http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/DEON/?00003},
  isbn={978-1-84890-352-4},
  publisher={College Publications},
  address={Rickmansworth},
  booktitle={Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021},
  pages={394--413},
  editor={Liu, Fenrong and Marra, Alessandra and Portner, Paul and Van De Putte, Frederik},
  author={Schuster, Daniela}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56744">
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-04T12:31:51Z</dc:date>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56744"/>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56744/3/Schuster_2-f8tljn56wi058.pdf"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:creator>Schuster, Daniela</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Schuster, Daniela</dc:contributor>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56744/3/Schuster_2-f8tljn56wi058.pdf"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
    <dcterms:title>Forms and Norms of Indecision in Argumentation Theory</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">One main goal of argumentation theory is to evaluate arguments and to determine whether they should be accepted or rejected. When there is no clear answer, a third option, being undecided, has to be taken into account. Indecision is often not considered explicitly, but rather taken to be a collection of all unclear or troubling cases. However, current philosophy makes a strong point for taking indecision itself to be a proper object of consideration. This paper aims at revealing parallels between the findings concerning indecision in philosophy and the treatment of indecision in argumentation theory. By investigating what philosophical forms and norms of indecision are involved in argumentation theory, we can improve our understanding of the different uncertain evidential situations in argumentation theory.</dcterms:abstract>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-04T12:31:51Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
Prüfdatum der URL
2022-03-04
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen