Forms and Norms of Indecision in Argumentation Theory
Forms and Norms of Indecision in Argumentation Theory
Loading...
Date
2021
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Contribution to a conference collection
Publication status
Published
Published in
Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021 / Liu, Fenrong; Marra, Alessandra; Portner, Paul; Van De Putte, Frederik (ed.). - Rickmansworth : College Publications, 2021. - pp. 394-413. - ISBN 978-1-84890-352-4
Abstract
One main goal of argumentation theory is to evaluate arguments and to determine whether they should be accepted or rejected. When there is no clear answer, a third option, being undecided, has to be taken into account. Indecision is often not considered explicitly, but rather taken to be a collection of all unclear or troubling cases. However, current philosophy makes a strong point for taking indecision itself to be a proper object of consideration. This paper aims at revealing parallels between the findings concerning indecision in philosophy and the treatment of indecision in argumentation theory. By investigating what philosophical forms and norms of indecision are involved in argumentation theory, we can improve our understanding of the different uncertain evidential situations in argumentation theory.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
100 Philosophy
Keywords
Labelling Approach, Statement Labelling, Indecision, Doxastic Indecision, Suspension of Judgement
Conference
Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021, Jul 21, 2021 - Jul 24, 2021, München
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
SCHUSTER, Daniela, 2021. Forms and Norms of Indecision in Argumentation Theory. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021. München, Jul 21, 2021 - Jul 24, 2021. In: LIU, Fenrong, ed., Alessandra MARRA, ed., Paul PORTNER, ed., Frederik VAN DE PUTTE, ed.. Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021. Rickmansworth:College Publications, pp. 394-413. ISBN 978-1-84890-352-4BibTex
@inproceedings{Schuster2021Forms-56744, year={2021}, title={Forms and Norms of Indecision in Argumentation Theory}, url={http://www.collegepublications.co.uk/DEON/?00003}, isbn={978-1-84890-352-4}, publisher={College Publications}, address={Rickmansworth}, booktitle={Deontic Logic and Normative Systems, 15th International Conference, DEON 2020/2021}, pages={394--413}, editor={Liu, Fenrong and Marra, Alessandra and Portner, Paul and Van De Putte, Frederik}, author={Schuster, Daniela} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56744"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-04T12:31:51Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56744"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56744/3/Schuster_2-f8tljn56wi058.pdf"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:creator>Schuster, Daniela</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Schuster, Daniela</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56744/3/Schuster_2-f8tljn56wi058.pdf"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:title>Forms and Norms of Indecision in Argumentation Theory</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">One main goal of argumentation theory is to evaluate arguments and to determine whether they should be accepted or rejected. When there is no clear answer, a third option, being undecided, has to be taken into account. Indecision is often not considered explicitly, but rather taken to be a collection of all unclear or troubling cases. However, current philosophy makes a strong point for taking indecision itself to be a proper object of consideration. This paper aims at revealing parallels between the findings concerning indecision in philosophy and the treatment of indecision in argumentation theory. By investigating what philosophical forms and norms of indecision are involved in argumentation theory, we can improve our understanding of the different uncertain evidential situations in argumentation theory.</dcterms:abstract> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-04T12:31:51Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
URL of original publication
Test date of URL
2022-03-04
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes