Logical and Analogical Thinking
Lade...
Dateien
Datum
2020
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Gold
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea. Universidade de Brasilia. 2020, 8(2), pp. 177-190. eISSN 2317-9570
Zusammenfassung
The contrast between logical and analogical thinking is illustrated by therepresentative views of Frege and Nietzsche. These ways of thinking turn out to beexpressions of different ways of conceiving the world. They stand for two opposingtraditions of contemporary philosophy: scientific-analytic philosophy and postmoderndeconstruction. Based on Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language, it is argued that neitherof the two perspectives is absolute, but that both should complement each other.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
100 Philosophie
Schlagwörter
Complementarity, Family, Resemblance, Logic, Metaphor, Rhetoric, Frege, Nietzsche, Wittgenstein
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690
GABRIEL, Gottfried, 2020. Logical and Analogical Thinking. In: Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea. Universidade de Brasilia. 2020, 8(2), pp. 177-190. eISSN 2317-9570BibTex
@article{Gabriel2020Logic-56776, year={2020}, title={Logical and Analogical Thinking}, number={2}, volume={8}, journal={Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea}, pages={177--190}, author={Gabriel, Gottfried} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/56776"> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-08T11:03:46Z</dc:date> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56776/3/Gabriel_2-e092e3fkk8rf2.pdf"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:issued>2020</dcterms:issued> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Gabriel, Gottfried</dc:contributor> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The contrast between logical and analogical thinking is illustrated by therepresentative views of Frege and Nietzsche. These ways of thinking turn out to beexpressions of different ways of conceiving the world. They stand for two opposingtraditions of contemporary philosophy: scientific-analytic philosophy and postmoderndeconstruction. Based on Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language, it is argued that neitherof the two perspectives is absolute, but that both should complement each other.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Gabriel, Gottfried</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/56776"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/56776/3/Gabriel_2-e092e3fkk8rf2.pdf"/> <dcterms:title>Logical and Analogical Thinking</dcterms:title> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-03-08T11:03:46Z</dcterms:available> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Begutachtet
Unbekannt