Taking Matters into their own hands : an analysis of the determinants of state-conducted peacekeeping in cicil wars
Taking Matters into their own hands : an analysis of the determinants of state-conducted peacekeeping in cicil wars
Loading...
Files
Date
2011
Authors
Greig, Michael
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published in
Journal of Peace Research ; 48 (2011), 2. - pp. 171-184. - ISSN 0022-3433
Abstract
Why and when do states take the burden upon themselves to send peacekeepers into a civil war, rather than relying on intergovernmental organizations to do so? While there are a few empirical studies on the conditions under which the UN sends peacekeeping missions, no such analyses of state-conducted peacekeeping exist. In this study, a theoretical framework on state-conducted peacekeeping in civil wars is developed and empirically tested. Not surprisingly, when acting outside international organizations, states are able to take their own interests directly into account and select those civil wars to which they send peacekeepers accordingly. States’ interests play a much greater role here than, for example, the interests of the major powers do forUNpeacekeeping. When states send peacekeepers they are more likely to choose former colonies, military allies, trade partners, or countries with which they have ethnic ties. Yet, this does not mean that state-conducted peacekeeping occurs only where states see their own interests. Contrary to conventional wisdom, states also provide peacekeeping to ‘tough’ cases, the most challenging civil wars. These are long, ethnic wars. This tendency for states to provide peacekeeping holds when civil wars produce dire effects on civilians. States are more likely to send peacekeepers into civil wars that kill or displace many people. Finally, states react to opportunities: the more previous mediation attempts, the higher the chances for state-conducted peacekeeping.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
320 Politics
Keywords
civil war,conflict management,conflict resolution,peacekeeping,United Nations
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
ROST, Nicolas, Michael GREIG, 2011. Taking Matters into their own hands : an analysis of the determinants of state-conducted peacekeeping in cicil wars. In: Journal of Peace Research. 48(2), pp. 171-184. ISSN 0022-3433. Available under: doi: 10.1177/0022343310396110BibTex
@article{Rost2011Takin-18363, year={2011}, doi={10.1177/0022343310396110}, title={Taking Matters into their own hands : an analysis of the determinants of state-conducted peacekeeping in cicil wars}, number={2}, volume={48}, issn={0022-3433}, journal={Journal of Peace Research}, pages={171--184}, author={Rost, Nicolas and Greig, Michael} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/18363"> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:creator>Rost, Nicolas</dc:creator> <dc:contributor>Greig, Michael</dc:contributor> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/18363/2/Rost.pdf"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-02-13T08:02:06Z</dcterms:available> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dcterms:bibliographicCitation>First publ. in: Journal of Peace Research ; 48 (2011), 2. - pp. 171–184</dcterms:bibliographicCitation> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2012-02-13T08:02:06Z</dc:date> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/> <dc:contributor>Rost, Nicolas</dc:contributor> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:title>Taking Matters into their own hands : an analysis of the determinants of state-conducted peacekeeping in cicil wars</dcterms:title> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Why and when do states take the burden upon themselves to send peacekeepers into a civil war, rather than relying on intergovernmental organizations to do so? While there are a few empirical studies on the conditions under which the UN sends peacekeeping missions, no such analyses of state-conducted peacekeeping exist. In this study, a theoretical framework on state-conducted peacekeeping in civil wars is developed and empirically tested. Not surprisingly, when acting outside international organizations, states are able to take their own interests directly into account and select those civil wars to which they send peacekeepers accordingly. States’ interests play a much greater role here than, for example, the interests of the major powers do forUNpeacekeeping. When states send peacekeepers they are more likely to choose former colonies, military allies, trade partners, or countries with which they have ethnic ties. Yet, this does not mean that state-conducted peacekeeping occurs only where states see their own interests. Contrary to conventional wisdom, states also provide peacekeeping to ‘tough’ cases, the most challenging civil wars. These are long, ethnic wars. This tendency for states to provide peacekeeping holds when civil wars produce dire effects on civilians. States are more likely to send peacekeepers into civil wars that kill or displace many people. Finally, states react to opportunities: the more previous mediation attempts, the higher the chances for state-conducted peacekeeping.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:issued>2011</dcterms:issued> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="http://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/18363"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/18363/2/Rost.pdf"/> <dc:creator>Greig, Michael</dc:creator> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>