Publikation:

Dispute or Mediator? : The Selection and Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Civil Wars

Vorschaubild

Dateien

Pospieszna_2-dlytai1msb935.pdf
Pospieszna_2-dlytai1msb935.pdfGröße: 389.93 KBDownloads: 851

Datum

2017

Autor:innen

Herausgeber:innen

Kontakt

ISSN der Zeitschrift

Electronic ISSN

ISBN

Bibliografische Daten

Verlag

Schriftenreihe

Auflagebezeichnung

URI (zitierfähiger Link)
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-2-dlytai1msb935
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
https://doi.org/10.14746/ps.2017.1.7
ArXiv-ID

Internationale Patentnummer

Link zur Lizenz
Urheberrechtlich geschützt

Angaben zur Forschungsförderung

Projekt

Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft: Publikationen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz

Gesperrt bis

Titel in einer weiteren Sprache

Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published

Erschienen in

Przegląd Strategiczny. 2017, 10(1), pp. 133-156. ISSN 2084-6991. Available under: doi: 10.14746/ps.2017.1.7

Zusammenfassung

The literature on conflict management offers two explanations of why the effectiveness of third parties to settle militarized disputes differs. The structural research tradition focuses on conflict characteristics, while the individualist approaches highlight the background, skills and power of a mediator, as well as the mediation strategy. This article reconciles these two approaches, and examines especially the effectiveness of mediation strategies. Accounting for the selection of mediation and the success of mediation attempts, we use the CWM 1945–2004 dataset. The analysis demonstrates that mediators who were able to pursue a determined strategy face a higher chance of success.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache

Fachgebiet (DDC)
320 Politik

Schlagwörter

civil wars, civil war mediation, conflict resolution, mediation strategies

Konferenz

Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined

Forschungsvorhaben

Organisationseinheiten

Zeitschriftenheft

Verknüpfte Datensätze

Zitieren

ISO 690POSPIESZNA, Paulina, Gerald SCHNEIDER, 2017. Dispute or Mediator? : The Selection and Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Civil Wars. In: Przegląd Strategiczny. 2017, 10(1), pp. 133-156. ISSN 2084-6991. Available under: doi: 10.14746/ps.2017.1.7
BibTex
@article{Pospieszna2017Dispu-40714,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.14746/ps.2017.1.7},
  title={Dispute or Mediator? : The Selection and Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Civil Wars},
  number={1},
  volume={10},
  issn={2084-6991},
  journal={Przegląd Strategiczny},
  pages={133--156},
  author={Pospieszna, Paulina and Schneider, Gerald}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40714">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Schneider, Gerald</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/40714/3/Pospieszna_2-dlytai1msb935.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Pospieszna, Paulina</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Pospieszna, Paulina</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-11-22T15:21:08Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-11-22T15:21:08Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Dispute or Mediator? : The Selection and Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Civil Wars</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The literature on conflict management offers two explanations of why the effectiveness of third parties to settle militarized disputes differs. The structural research tradition focuses on conflict characteristics, while the individualist approaches highlight the background, skills and power of a mediator, as well as the mediation strategy. This article reconciles these two approaches, and examines especially the effectiveness of mediation strategies. Accounting for the selection of mediation and the success of mediation attempts, we use the CWM 1945–2004 dataset. The analysis demonstrates that mediators who were able to pursue a determined strategy face a higher chance of success.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/40714"/>
    <dc:contributor>Schneider, Gerald</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/40714/3/Pospieszna_2-dlytai1msb935.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Interner Vermerk

xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter

Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.

Prüfdatum der URL

Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation

Finanzierungsart

Kommentar zur Publikation

Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Diese Publikation teilen