Dispute or Mediator? : The Selection and Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Civil Wars

Pospieszna, Paulina; Schneider, Gerald

Dispute or Mediator? : The Selection and Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Civil Wars

Dateien

Pospieszna_2-dlytai1msb935.pdfGröße: 389.93 KBDownloads: 837

Datum

2017

Open Access-Veröffentlichung

Open Access Green

Sammlungen

Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft

Publikationstyp

Zeitschriftenartikel

Publikationsstatus

Published

Erschienen in

Przegląd Strategiczny. 2017, 10(1), pp. 133-156. ISSN 2084-6991. Available under: doi: 10.14746/ps.2017.1.7

Zusammenfassung

The literature on conflict management offers two explanations of why the effectiveness of third parties to settle militarized disputes differs. The structural research tradition focuses on conflict characteristics, while the individualist approaches highlight the background, skills and power of a mediator, as well as the mediation strategy. This article reconciles these two approaches, and examines especially the effectiveness of mediation strategies. Accounting for the selection of mediation and the success of mediation attempts, we use the CWM 1945–2004 dataset. The analysis demonstrates that mediators who were able to pursue a determined strategy face a higher chance of success.

Fachgebiet (DDC)

320 Politik

Schlagwörter

civil wars, civil war mediation, conflict resolution, mediation strategies

Zitieren

ISO 690

POSPIESZNA, Paulina, Gerald SCHNEIDER, 2017. Dispute or Mediator? : The Selection and Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Civil Wars. In: Przegląd Strategiczny. 2017, 10(1), pp. 133-156. ISSN 2084-6991. Available under: doi: 10.14746/ps.2017.1.7

BibTex

@article{Pospieszna2017Dispu-40714,
  year={2017},
  doi={10.14746/ps.2017.1.7},
  title={Dispute or Mediator? : The Selection and Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Civil Wars},
  number={1},
  volume={10},
  issn={2084-6991},
  journal={Przegląd Strategiczny},
  pages={133--156},
  author={Pospieszna, Paulina and Schneider, Gerald}
}

RDF

<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40714">
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2017</dcterms:issued>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Schneider, Gerald</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/40714/3/Pospieszna_2-dlytai1msb935.pdf"/>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/42"/>
    <dc:creator>Pospieszna, Paulina</dc:creator>
    <dc:contributor>Pospieszna, Paulina</dc:contributor>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-11-22T15:21:08Z</dcterms:available>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2017-11-22T15:21:08Z</dc:date>
    <dcterms:title>Dispute or Mediator? : The Selection and Effectiveness of Conflict Management in Civil Wars</dcterms:title>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The literature on conflict management offers two explanations of why the effectiveness of third parties to settle militarized disputes differs. The structural research tradition focuses on conflict characteristics, while the individualist approaches highlight the background, skills and power of a mediator, as well as the mediation strategy. This article reconciles these two approaches, and examines especially the effectiveness of mediation strategies. Accounting for the selection of mediation and the success of mediation attempts, we use the CWM 1945–2004 dataset. The analysis demonstrates that mediators who were able to pursue a determined strategy face a higher chance of success.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/40714"/>
    <dc:contributor>Schneider, Gerald</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/40714/3/Pospieszna_2-dlytai1msb935.pdf"/>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>

Universitätsbibliographie

Ja