Impact of disease risk on the narrative bias in vaccination risk perceptions
Impact of disease risk on the narrative bias in vaccination risk perceptions
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2020
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
oops
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Psychology & Health ; 35 (2020), 3. - pp. 346-365. - Routledge, Taylor & Francis. - ISSN 0887-0446. - eISSN 1476-8321
Abstract
Objective: Previous studies have shown that even when a statistical base-rate of vaccine adverse events (VAE) is provided, a small sample of single-case narratives influences vaccination risk perceptions and vaccination intentions, irrespective of various content characteristics. This study investigated whether this narrative bias is moderated by an environmental feature, namely the risk of the disease.
Design: In three online-experiments, 564 subjects were presented with statistical information (20%) about the probability of VAE associated with a hypothetical vaccination and with a sample of narratives describing personal vaccination experiences. The relative frequency of narratives reporting VAE was varied between-subjects (5/20/35%) to test for a bias. Three potential moderators were tested: likelihood of infection, severity of disease and perceived susceptibility to the disease.
Main outcome measures: Perceived risk of vaccination and intention to get vaccinated.
Results: Compared to the control condition (20%), narratives reporting VAE increased (35%) and decreased (5%) risk perceptions, which affected vaccination intentions respectively. This bias was not affected by any variable pertaining to the disease risk.
Conclusion: People’s vaccination decisions are reliably affected by small samples of single-case vaccination experiences. As this influence works in either direction, health communicators should provide people with many examples of safely completed vaccinations.
Design: In three online-experiments, 564 subjects were presented with statistical information (20%) about the probability of VAE associated with a hypothetical vaccination and with a sample of narratives describing personal vaccination experiences. The relative frequency of narratives reporting VAE was varied between-subjects (5/20/35%) to test for a bias. Three potential moderators were tested: likelihood of infection, severity of disease and perceived susceptibility to the disease.
Main outcome measures: Perceived risk of vaccination and intention to get vaccinated.
Results: Compared to the control condition (20%), narratives reporting VAE increased (35%) and decreased (5%) risk perceptions, which affected vaccination intentions respectively. This bias was not affected by any variable pertaining to the disease risk.
Conclusion: People’s vaccination decisions are reliably affected by small samples of single-case vaccination experiences. As this influence works in either direction, health communicators should provide people with many examples of safely completed vaccinations.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
150 Psychology
Keywords
Vaccination, risk perception, narrative bias, negativity bias
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
HAASE, Niels, Philipp SCHMID, Cornelia BETSCH, 2020. Impact of disease risk on the narrative bias in vaccination risk perceptions. In: Psychology & Health. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. 35(3), pp. 346-365. ISSN 0887-0446. eISSN 1476-8321. Available under: doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1630561BibTex
@article{Haase2020-03-03Impac-47040, year={2020}, doi={10.1080/08870446.2019.1630561}, title={Impact of disease risk on the narrative bias in vaccination risk perceptions}, number={3}, volume={35}, issn={0887-0446}, journal={Psychology & Health}, pages={346--365}, author={Haase, Niels and Schmid, Philipp and Betsch, Cornelia} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47040"> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:title>Impact of disease risk on the narrative bias in vaccination risk perceptions</dcterms:title> <dc:contributor>Betsch, Cornelia</dc:contributor> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dcterms:issued>2020-03-03</dcterms:issued> <dc:contributor>Schmid, Philipp</dc:contributor> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-09-26T11:53:13Z</dcterms:available> <dc:creator>Betsch, Cornelia</dc:creator> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Objective: Previous studies have shown that even when a statistical base-rate of vaccine adverse events (VAE) is provided, a small sample of single-case narratives influences vaccination risk perceptions and vaccination intentions, irrespective of various content characteristics. This study investigated whether this narrative bias is moderated by an environmental feature, namely the risk of the disease.<br /><br />Design: In three online-experiments, 564 subjects were presented with statistical information (20%) about the probability of VAE associated with a hypothetical vaccination and with a sample of narratives describing personal vaccination experiences. The relative frequency of narratives reporting VAE was varied between-subjects (5/20/35%) to test for a bias. Three potential moderators were tested: likelihood of infection, severity of disease and perceived susceptibility to the disease.<br /><br />Main outcome measures: Perceived risk of vaccination and intention to get vaccinated.<br /><br />Results: Compared to the control condition (20%), narratives reporting VAE increased (35%) and decreased (5%) risk perceptions, which affected vaccination intentions respectively. This bias was not affected by any variable pertaining to the disease risk.<br /><br />Conclusion: People’s vaccination decisions are reliably affected by small samples of single-case vaccination experiences. As this influence works in either direction, health communicators should provide people with many examples of safely completed vaccinations.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:creator>Schmid, Philipp</dc:creator> <dc:creator>Haase, Niels</dc:creator> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/43"/> <dc:contributor>Haase, Niels</dc:contributor> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47040"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-09-26T11:53:13Z</dc:date> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
No
Refereed
Yes