Der Schnitt gegen den Feind : Polemische Praktiken bei Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus, John Heartfield
Der Schnitt gegen den Feind : Polemische Praktiken bei Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus, John Heartfield
No Thumbnail Available
Files
There are no files associated with this item.
Date
2021
Authors
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
DOI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Musil-Forum ; 36 (2019/2020) (2021). - pp. 38-55. - De Gruyter. - ISSN 1016-1333
Abstract
This article deals with the transformation of polemical literature and art in the age of modern mass media and concentrates on the conceptualization of enmity, the aims of the attack, and the choice of weapons. It uses Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus and John Heartfield as examples to illustrate the following argument: while earlier polemical writing was guided by principles of argutia and epigrammatical sharpness and borrowed its metaphors from the courteous sphere of the duel, modern polemicists employ ›cut and paste‹ methods, attacking the enemy by cutting up his or her own works or media representations. They fragmentize and rearrange newspaper articles and images to bring about the self-destruction of the author’s work. This shows how polemicists adapt their technique to the materials circulated by the press. Thus, rhetorical attacks are transformed into »pratiques de papier« in which the metaphorical sword and dagger are replaced by scissors: a tool that degrades the enemy by cutting up and collaging his or her words and images.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
800 Literature, Rhetoric, Literary Science
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
VOGEL, Juliane, 2021. Der Schnitt gegen den Feind : Polemische Praktiken bei Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus, John Heartfield. In: Musil-Forum. De Gruyter. 36 (2019/2020), pp. 38-55. ISSN 1016-1333. Available under: doi: 10.1515/9783110730401-004BibTex
@article{Vogel2021Schni-57462, year={2021}, doi={10.1515/9783110730401-004}, title={Der Schnitt gegen den Feind : Polemische Praktiken bei Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus, John Heartfield}, volume={36 (2019/2020)}, issn={1016-1333}, journal={Musil-Forum}, pages={38--55}, author={Vogel, Juliane} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/57462"> <dcterms:title>Der Schnitt gegen den Feind : Polemische Praktiken bei Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus, John Heartfield</dcterms:title> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/> <dc:language>deu</dc:language> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">This article deals with the transformation of polemical literature and art in the age of modern mass media and concentrates on the conceptualization of enmity, the aims of the attack, and the choice of weapons. It uses Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus and John Heartfield as examples to illustrate the following argument: while earlier polemical writing was guided by principles of argutia and epigrammatical sharpness and borrowed its metaphors from the courteous sphere of the duel, modern polemicists employ ›cut and paste‹ methods, attacking the enemy by cutting up his or her own works or media representations. They fragmentize and rearrange newspaper articles and images to bring about the self-destruction of the author’s work. This shows how polemicists adapt their technique to the materials circulated by the press. Thus, rhetorical attacks are transformed into »pratiques de papier« in which the metaphorical sword and dagger are replaced by scissors: a tool that degrades the enemy by cutting up and collaging his or her words and images.</dcterms:abstract> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-06T13:55:12Z</dc:date> <dc:creator>Vogel, Juliane</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57462"/> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-06T13:55:12Z</dcterms:available> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dc:contributor>Vogel, Juliane</dc:contributor> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes
Refereed
Yes