Der Schnitt gegen den Feind : Polemische Praktiken bei Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus, John Heartfield

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2021
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Zeitschriftenartikel
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
Musil-Forum. De Gruyter. 2021, 36 (2019/2020), pp. 38-55. ISSN 1016-1333. Available under: doi: 10.1515/9783110730401-004
Zusammenfassung

This article deals with the transformation of polemical literature and art in the age of modern mass media and concentrates on the conceptualization of enmity, the aims of the attack, and the choice of weapons. It uses Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus and John Heartfield as examples to illustrate the following argument: while earlier polemical writing was guided by principles of argutia and epigrammatical sharpness and borrowed its metaphors from the courteous sphere of the duel, modern polemicists employ ›cut and paste‹ methods, attacking the enemy by cutting up his or her own works or media representations. They fragmentize and rearrange newspaper articles and images to bring about the self-destruction of the author’s work. This shows how polemicists adapt their technique to the materials circulated by the press. Thus, rhetorical attacks are transformed into »pratiques de papier« in which the metaphorical sword and dagger are replaced by scissors: a tool that degrades the enemy by cutting up and collaging his or her words and images.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
800 Literatur, Rhetorik, Literaturwissenschaft
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690VOGEL, Juliane, 2021. Der Schnitt gegen den Feind : Polemische Praktiken bei Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus, John Heartfield. In: Musil-Forum. De Gruyter. 2021, 36 (2019/2020), pp. 38-55. ISSN 1016-1333. Available under: doi: 10.1515/9783110730401-004
BibTex
@article{Vogel2021Schni-57462,
  year={2021},
  doi={10.1515/9783110730401-004},
  title={Der Schnitt gegen den Feind : Polemische Praktiken bei Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus, John Heartfield},
  volume={36 (2019/2020)},
  issn={1016-1333},
  journal={Musil-Forum},
  pages={38--55},
  author={Vogel, Juliane}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/57462">
    <dcterms:title>Der Schnitt gegen den Feind : Polemische Praktiken bei Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus, John Heartfield</dcterms:title>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/>
    <dc:language>deu</dc:language>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="deu">This article deals with the transformation of polemical literature and art in the age of modern mass media and concentrates on the conceptualization of enmity, the aims of the attack, and the choice of weapons. It uses Edgar Allan Poe, Karl Kraus and John Heartfield as examples to illustrate the following argument: while earlier polemical writing was guided by principles of argutia and epigrammatical sharpness and borrowed its metaphors from the courteous sphere of the duel, modern polemicists employ ›cut and paste‹ methods, attacking the enemy by cutting up his or her own works or media representations. They fragmentize and rearrange newspaper articles and images to bring about the self-destruction of the author’s work. This shows how polemicists adapt their technique to the materials circulated by the press. Thus, rhetorical attacks are transformed into »pratiques de papier« in which the metaphorical sword and dagger are replaced by scissors: a tool that degrades the enemy by cutting up and collaging his or her words and images.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-06T13:55:12Z</dc:date>
    <dc:creator>Vogel, Juliane</dc:creator>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/57462"/>
    <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2022-05-06T13:55:12Z</dcterms:available>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/38"/>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dc:contributor>Vogel, Juliane</dc:contributor>
    <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights>
    <dcterms:issued>2021</dcterms:issued>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet
Ja
Diese Publikation teilen