Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents : the State of the Art
Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents : the State of the Art
Loading...
Date
2015
Authors
Godden, David
Editors
Journal ISSN
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliographical data
Publisher
Series
URI (citable link)
International patent number
Link to the license
EU project number
Project
Open Access publication
Collections
Title in another language
Publication type
Journal article
Publication status
Published
Published in
Informal Logic ; 35 (2015), 1. - pp. 88-134. - ISSN 0824-2577
Abstract
Recent work on conditional reasoning argues that denying the antecedent [DA] and affirming the consequent [AC] are defeasible but cogent patterns of argument, either because they are effective, rational, albeit heuristic applications of Bayesian probability, or because they are licensed by the principle of total evidence. Against this, we show that on any prevailing interpretation of indicative conditionals the premises of DA and AC arguments do not license their conclusions without additional assumptions. The cogency of DA and AC inferences rather depends on contingent factors extrinsic to, and independent of, what is asserted by DA and AC arguments.
Summary in another language
Subject (DDC)
100 Philosophy
Keywords
Conference
Review
undefined / . - undefined, undefined. - (undefined; undefined)
Cite This
ISO 690
GODDEN, David, Frank ZENKER, 2015. Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents : the State of the Art. In: Informal Logic. 35(1), pp. 88-134. ISSN 0824-2577BibTex
@article{Godden2015Denyi-32263, year={2015}, title={Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents : the State of the Art}, number={1}, volume={35}, issn={0824-2577}, journal={Informal Logic}, pages={88--134}, author={Godden, David and Zenker, Frank} }
RDF
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/" xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/32263"> <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/> <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/32263/1/Godden_0-298052.pdf"/> <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">Recent work on conditional reasoning argues that denying the antecedent [DA] and affirming the consequent [AC] are defeasible but cogent patterns of argument, either because they are effective, rational, albeit heuristic applications of Bayesian probability, or because they are licensed by the principle of total evidence. Against this, we show that on any prevailing interpretation of indicative conditionals the premises of DA and AC arguments do not license their conclusions without additional assumptions. The cogency of DA and AC inferences rather depends on contingent factors extrinsic to, and independent of, what is asserted by DA and AC arguments.</dcterms:abstract> <dcterms:title>Denying Antecedents and Affirming Consequents : the State of the Art</dcterms:title> <dcterms:rights rdf:resource="https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/"/> <dc:contributor>Zenker, Frank</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Zenker, Frank</dc:creator> <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-11-26T13:16:33Z</dcterms:available> <dc:rights>terms-of-use</dc:rights> <dc:language>eng</dc:language> <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/> <dc:contributor>Godden, David</dc:contributor> <dc:creator>Godden, David</dc:creator> <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/32263"/> <dcterms:issued>2015</dcterms:issued> <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/> <dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/32263/1/Godden_0-298052.pdf"/> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2015-11-26T13:16:33Z</dc:date> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF>
Internal note
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Examination date of dissertation
Method of financing
Comment on publication
Alliance license
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
International Co-Authors
Bibliography of Konstanz
Yes