Publikation: Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism
Dateien
Datum
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
DOI (zitierfähiger Link)
Internationale Patentnummer
Link zur Lizenz
Angaben zur Forschungsförderung
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Sammlungen
Core Facility der Universität Konstanz
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Publikationstyp
Publikationsstatus
Erschienen in
Zusammenfassung
Aesthetic statements of the form ‘X is beautiful’ are evaluative; they indicate the speaker’s positive affective attitude regarding X. Why is this so? Is the evaluative content part of the truth conditions, or is it a pragmatic phenomenon (i.e. presupposition, implicature)? First, I argue that semantic approaches as well as these pragmatic ones cannot satisfactorily explain the evaluativity of aesthetic statements. Second, I offer a positive proposal based on a speech-act theoretical version of hybrid expressivism, which states that, with the literal utterance of ‘X is beautiful’, we perform two illocutionary acts simultaneously, an assertive and an expressive one. I will specify this theory in detail and argue that it can satisfactorily account for the evaluative content of aesthetic statements. I will also discuss the advantages of the theory over other variants of expressivism in meta-aesthetics.
Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
Zitieren
ISO 690
BRIESEN, Jochen, 2024. Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism. In: Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy. University of Michigan Library. 2024, 11(0), 19. eISSN 2330-4014. Verfügbar unter: doi: 10.3998/ergo.6159BibTex
@article{Briesen2024-07-18Aesth-70696,
year={2024},
doi={10.3998/ergo.6159},
title={Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism},
number={0},
volume={11},
journal={Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy},
author={Briesen, Jochen},
note={Article Number: 19}
}RDF
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" >
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/70696">
<dcterms:hasPart rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/70696/1/Briesen_2-bvgl680576nr9.pdf"/>
<dcterms:rights rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/"/>
<dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-09-02T10:46:38Z</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Briesen, Jochen</dc:creator>
<dcterms:issued>2024-07-18</dcterms:issued>
<dcterms:title>Aesthetic Judgments, Evaluative Content, and (Hybrid) Expressivism</dcterms:title>
<void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
<bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/70696"/>
<dc:contributor>Briesen, Jochen</dc:contributor>
<dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2024-09-02T10:46:38Z</dcterms:available>
<dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dcterms:abstract>Aesthetic statements of the form ‘X is beautiful’ are evaluative; they indicate the speaker’s positive affective attitude regarding X. Why is this so? Is the evaluative content part of the truth conditions, or is it a pragmatic phenomenon (i.e. presupposition, implicature)? First, I argue that semantic approaches as well as these pragmatic ones cannot satisfactorily explain the evaluativity of aesthetic statements. Second, I offer a positive proposal based on a speech-act theoretical version of hybrid expressivism, which states that, with the literal utterance of ‘X is beautiful’, we perform two illocutionary acts simultaneously, an assertive and an expressive one. I will specify this theory in detail and argue that it can satisfactorily account for the evaluative content of aesthetic statements. I will also discuss the advantages of the theory over other variants of expressivism in meta-aesthetics.</dcterms:abstract>
<dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/40"/>
<foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
<dc:rights>Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International</dc:rights>
<dspace:hasBitstream rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/123456789/70696/1/Briesen_2-bvgl680576nr9.pdf"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>