'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal

Lade...
Vorschaubild
Dateien
Zu diesem Dokument gibt es keine Dateien.
Datum
2019
Autor:innen
Herausgeber:innen
Kontakt
ISSN der Zeitschrift
Electronic ISSN
ISBN
Bibliografische Daten
Verlag
Schriftenreihe
Auflagebezeichnung
URI (zitierfähiger Link)
ArXiv-ID
Internationale Patentnummer
EU-Projektnummer
DFG-Projektnummer
Projekt
Open Access-Veröffentlichung
Gesperrt bis
Titel in einer weiteren Sprache
Forschungsvorhaben
Organisationseinheiten
Zeitschriftenheft
Publikationstyp
Beitrag zu einem Sammelband
Publikationsstatus
Published
Erschienen in
BREUER, Marten, ed.. Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?. Berlin: Springer, 2019, pp. 323-350. ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11
Zusammenfassung

The chapter analyses the national practice apparent from previous chapters, claiming that not each and every disagreement by a national actor amounts to ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the difference between res judicata and res interpretata is pivotal in this regard. In most cases, the way in which disagreement with the ECtHR is expressed is far more important than the disagreement as such (hence the claim for ‘respectful disobedience’). Finally, the chapter aims to identify the root causes of ‘principled resistance’. It argues that neither the hierarchical position of the Convention under national law nor the purported ‘national identity’ are sufficient to explain the phenomenon. Rather, ‘principled resistance’ cases should be viewed as a struggle about the proper allocation of power in the relationship between Strasbourg and the national level.

Zusammenfassung in einer weiteren Sprache
Fachgebiet (DDC)
340 Recht
Schlagwörter
Konferenz
Rezension
undefined / . - undefined, undefined
Zitieren
ISO 690BREUER, Marten, 2019. 'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal. In: BREUER, Marten, ed.. Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?. Berlin: Springer, 2019, pp. 323-350. ISBN 978-3-662-58985-4. Available under: doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11
BibTex
@incollection{Breuer2019-07-18Princ-47197,
  year={2019},
  doi={10.1007/978-3-662-58986-1_11},
  title={'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal},
  number={285},
  isbn={978-3-662-58985-4},
  publisher={Springer},
  address={Berlin},
  series={Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht},
  booktitle={Principled Resistance to ECtHR Judgments : A New Paradigm?},
  pages={323--350},
  editor={Breuer, Marten},
  author={Breuer, Marten}
}
RDF
<rdf:RDF
    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:bibo="http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/"
    xmlns:dspace="http://digital-repositories.org/ontologies/dspace/0.1.0#"
    xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/"
    xmlns:void="http://rdfs.org/ns/void#"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" > 
  <rdf:Description rdf:about="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/47197">
    <dc:contributor>Breuer, Marten</dc:contributor>
    <void:sparqlEndpoint rdf:resource="http://localhost/fuseki/dspace/sparql"/>
    <dcterms:issued>2019-07-18</dcterms:issued>
    <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:40:41Z</dc:date>
    <foaf:homepage rdf:resource="http://localhost:8080/"/>
    <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
    <dcterms:isPartOf rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <dcterms:title>'Principled Resistance' to ECtHR Judgments : An Appraisal</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:abstract xml:lang="eng">The chapter analyses the national practice apparent from previous chapters, claiming that not each and every disagreement by a national actor amounts to ‘principled resistance’. It is submitted that the difference between res judicata and res interpretata is pivotal in this regard. In most cases, the way in which disagreement with the ECtHR is expressed is far more important than the disagreement as such (hence the claim for ‘respectful disobedience’). Finally, the chapter aims to identify the root causes of ‘principled resistance’. It argues that neither the hierarchical position of the Convention under national law nor the purported ‘national identity’ are sufficient to explain the phenomenon. Rather, ‘principled resistance’ cases should be viewed as a struggle about the proper allocation of power in the relationship between Strasbourg and the national level.</dcterms:abstract>
    <dspace:isPartOfCollection rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/server/rdf/resource/123456789/44"/>
    <bibo:uri rdf:resource="https://kops.uni-konstanz.de/handle/123456789/47197"/>
    <dc:creator>Breuer, Marten</dc:creator>
    <dcterms:available rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">2019-10-11T09:40:41Z</dcterms:available>
  </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Interner Vermerk
xmlui.Submission.submit.DescribeStep.inputForms.label.kops_note_fromSubmitter
Kontakt
URL der Originalveröffentl.
Prüfdatum der URL
Prüfungsdatum der Dissertation
Finanzierungsart
Kommentar zur Publikation
Allianzlizenz
Corresponding Authors der Uni Konstanz vorhanden
Internationale Co-Autor:innen
Universitätsbibliographie
Ja
Begutachtet